you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I am not entirely sure why the GPLv2 license wouldn't work for the BSDs, but either way I doubt that the problem was so big that it really required a license change. Everything in life is a trade-off, and I think the trade-off of not supporting the BSDs to prevent potential bad faith actors from "stealing the code without attribution" is a really bad trade-off.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    I am not entirely sure why the GPLv2 license wouldn’t work for the BSDs,

    The GPL is a copyleft license. Derivative and combined works must be published under the same license.

    You can use BSD with GPL and then publish as GPL, but you can not publish as BSD.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago (2 children)

    I understand that the licenses are different. What I dont understand is why the BSD operating systems cannot make use of Asahi if it is GPL licensed instead of MIT licensed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments