Incoming senators are nearly 15 years younger than departing ones, on average. But the chamber’s overall age isn’t shifting much.

Nov. 7, 2026Updated 3:17 p.m. ET

When the new Senate convenes in January, it will welcome some (relatively) young new legislators. A few are even millennials, including James Talarico of Texas, 37, and Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan, 42, two Democrats who may have energized young voters to turn out.

But their effect on the average age of the Senate — which has crept up over the last few decades — will be small. The senators of the 120th Congress will be less than a year younger, on average, than the Senate’s current members were at the start of the 119th Congress two years ago. That’s because so many sitting senators are old, and getting older.

These numbers assume that Mary Peltola and Scott Colom will win their races in Alaska and Mississippi; they were both ahead in the vote count Saturday. (If both lose, the Senate’s average age will land at 63.6.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 day ago

and if you choose a good degree, you’ll be rewarded for it quite well

Good salary shouldn't be the only motivation to pursue education. Teachers, historians, environmentalists, physicists, social workers... They all need education but don't make good money. Should we just stop deepening our knowledge about people and the world because there's no financial incentive to it? Mechanics and construction workers are also important but I don't think they should have advantage over teachers when it comes to retirement age.

  • source
  • parent