Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

56,102 readers

2,884 active

151 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderation log

moderators

If you can turn any (media) franchise you want into a LEGO set, which on you would go for? (Videogames, books, films, TV, etc.) (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by Squidiey@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Agreed. Kids shouldn't need a branded tie in to enjoy Lego. Just give them the building blocks (hey!) and let them build.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

To be fair, Lego was apparently on the verge of going under until they did a bunch of brand tie-ins. So I totally understand its need for survival, but maybe they could change the proportions a little

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] Squidiey@lemmy.ml [S] 5 points 1 day ago

Fr.

That's why I sometimes grab generic Lego City or whatever any generic Lego set.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent