▲ 95 ▼ Own Your Phone - a European Citizens' Initiative (www.ownyourphone.org) submitted 6 days ago by bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de to c/right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de 21 comments fedilink hide all child comments Join the action now! Help draft demands and proposals, add more languages to the website, and spread the word! EDIT: Now you can actually click through to the website! 😀
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 5 days ago (6 children) Not sure. Can you explain further? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 4 days ago (5 children) We need to combine powers to make one good OS, one good "office suite", one good "browser" and so on. There's too much division. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) Not gonna work, but you can always try Microsoft certainly has been trying for very long, luckily there are still forces trying to stop them. Maybe petition them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) I mean open-source, not microslop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children) Welk that's the thing about free software: you're never gonna have the One Ring To Rule Them All where there's unlimited choice. When people are free to make it how they like it, many will do just that. Of course there will be leaders, centers of gravity. My theory: the harder something is to make (and the more strongly it's subject to the network effect), the fewer variants of a solution there will be. The easier it is to come up with a solution, the more different ones there will be. As long as there's freedom, people are gonna opt for different ways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 11 hours ago* (1 child) Yes, it takes discipline and keeping your ego in check to build a collective project. But that is what we need, instead of 50 versions of the same idea but all incredibly limited, shitty and insecure. I am making a call for being civic contributor, for acting like you're part of a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 7 hours ago That call sadly is wasted on me. Try and gather some software developers around your cause. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 4 days ago (5 children) We need to combine powers to make one good OS, one good "office suite", one good "browser" and so on. There's too much division. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) Not gonna work, but you can always try Microsoft certainly has been trying for very long, luckily there are still forces trying to stop them. Maybe petition them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) I mean open-source, not microslop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children) Welk that's the thing about free software: you're never gonna have the One Ring To Rule Them All where there's unlimited choice. When people are free to make it how they like it, many will do just that. Of course there will be leaders, centers of gravity. My theory: the harder something is to make (and the more strongly it's subject to the network effect), the fewer variants of a solution there will be. The easier it is to come up with a solution, the more different ones there will be. As long as there's freedom, people are gonna opt for different ways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 11 hours ago* (1 child) Yes, it takes discipline and keeping your ego in check to build a collective project. But that is what we need, instead of 50 versions of the same idea but all incredibly limited, shitty and insecure. I am making a call for being civic contributor, for acting like you're part of a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 7 hours ago That call sadly is wasted on me. Try and gather some software developers around your cause. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) Not gonna work, but you can always try Microsoft certainly has been trying for very long, luckily there are still forces trying to stop them. Maybe petition them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) I mean open-source, not microslop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children) Welk that's the thing about free software: you're never gonna have the One Ring To Rule Them All where there's unlimited choice. When people are free to make it how they like it, many will do just that. Of course there will be leaders, centers of gravity. My theory: the harder something is to make (and the more strongly it's subject to the network effect), the fewer variants of a solution there will be. The easier it is to come up with a solution, the more different ones there will be. As long as there's freedom, people are gonna opt for different ways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 11 hours ago* (1 child) Yes, it takes discipline and keeping your ego in check to build a collective project. But that is what we need, instead of 50 versions of the same idea but all incredibly limited, shitty and insecure. I am making a call for being civic contributor, for acting like you're part of a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 7 hours ago That call sadly is wasted on me. Try and gather some software developers around your cause. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) I mean open-source, not microslop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children) Welk that's the thing about free software: you're never gonna have the One Ring To Rule Them All where there's unlimited choice. When people are free to make it how they like it, many will do just that. Of course there will be leaders, centers of gravity. My theory: the harder something is to make (and the more strongly it's subject to the network effect), the fewer variants of a solution there will be. The easier it is to come up with a solution, the more different ones there will be. As long as there's freedom, people are gonna opt for different ways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 11 hours ago* (1 child) Yes, it takes discipline and keeping your ego in check to build a collective project. But that is what we need, instead of 50 versions of the same idea but all incredibly limited, shitty and insecure. I am making a call for being civic contributor, for acting like you're part of a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 7 hours ago That call sadly is wasted on me. Try and gather some software developers around your cause. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children) Welk that's the thing about free software: you're never gonna have the One Ring To Rule Them All where there's unlimited choice. When people are free to make it how they like it, many will do just that. Of course there will be leaders, centers of gravity. My theory: the harder something is to make (and the more strongly it's subject to the network effect), the fewer variants of a solution there will be. The easier it is to come up with a solution, the more different ones there will be. As long as there's freedom, people are gonna opt for different ways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 11 hours ago* (1 child) Yes, it takes discipline and keeping your ego in check to build a collective project. But that is what we need, instead of 50 versions of the same idea but all incredibly limited, shitty and insecure. I am making a call for being civic contributor, for acting like you're part of a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 7 hours ago That call sadly is wasted on me. Try and gather some software developers around your cause. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 point 11 hours ago* (1 child) Yes, it takes discipline and keeping your ego in check to build a collective project. But that is what we need, instead of 50 versions of the same idea but all incredibly limited, shitty and insecure. I am making a call for being civic contributor, for acting like you're part of a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 7 hours ago That call sadly is wasted on me. Try and gather some software developers around your cause. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de [S] 1 point 7 hours ago That call sadly is wasted on me. Try and gather some software developers around your cause. permalink fedilink source parent