I was just reading about a violation of the Canadian fisheries act that has a maximum penalty of $200k, and realized the absurdity of there ever being a maximum fine.

There should be no maximum fine on any corporate penalty given that we do not cap the size of corporations or their bank accounts.

It would be like having maximum jail terms of 25 years for immortal beings that can live to 10,000.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 132 points 6 days ago (21 children)

Corporate fines should be in % of the company income.

I would also argue that personal fines should be like that too.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 82 points 5 days ago* (6 children)

    All fines should be a percentage of income. Otherwise we have what we call a poor tax on people who can’t afford it, and “the price of doing business” for people who can. And I’m not referring to just companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    It has to be worth, not just income. There's too many loopholes around "I don't have income I just have stock I use as collateral for a loan" or "I don't have income but my LLC happens to pay for all of my daily expenses".

    But yes, all fines need to scale with the perpetrator. The more dollars you have, the less each dollar means.

    A $100 ticket for parking on a crosswalk means nothing to a millionaire, but is potentially ruinous for someone living in poverty. It needs to hurt the same for everyone. The millionaire should have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars. They need to feel pain.

    A lot of people are really shitty and operate at a very basic level of moral reasoning. It's just "did I get punished?".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago

    I don't have income but my LLC happens to pay for all of my daily expenses

    That's income. Not according to tax laws, but that's also why we shouldn't base monetary penalties on tax law. These fuckers have been exploiting the loopholes to have the most money and power and also pay almost nothing. But they still eat! And grocery stores don't accept leveraged loans, securities, Bitcoin, or percentages of annuities... At some point, they touch money. So let's tax (and penalize) them so they can't avoid paying their fair share.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    just have stock I use as collateral for a loan

    Maybe stuff you can't pay with also shouldn't be allowed to loan money with. I know it currently does work like that, I'm just saying it shouldn't, because this creates so many loopholes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago

    A friend shared a memory of his drug dealer dad, when they were in vegas, lost a ton of money gambling and flipped the fuck out. Started smashing vases.

    Security approached. He threw hundred dollar bills at them. They started handing him more vases.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 5 days ago (6 children)

    Not income, global revenue of the parent company, like GDPR does it

    So if Google fucks up, it’s the full revenue of Alphabet Inc that determines the fine.

    That way you can’t found GDPR Violation Incorporated and do your shady stuff there risk free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Meanwhile, Google is illegally chopping down a forest to make space for a data centre. Those fines should be proportional to revenue too. That would teach them not to mess around with trees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Has anyone actually got hit with big gdpr fines?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Operate fines should be a % of income + the amount of illegal gains. Most times the fines today are much lower than the amount of profit they make from committing the crimw

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago* (1 child)

    *Networth

    You fuck up badly, better be ready to liquidate some assets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    Hmm. That's a very good point. And if corporations are "people", they should be the only people subjected to capital punishment.

    Cause serious enough harm? Fuck you, you're ALL getting fired. Or at least everyone in management; the ones who actually do the work rarely have any agency in the situation, so yeah maybe don't punish them. At least minimize harm, maybe nationalize resources and break it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago

    And that's for offense 1.

    Offense 2 within 5 years of the first would be same as offense 1, plus losing the right to pay dividends and issue derivatives for a year.

    Offense 3 within 5 years of the second would be same as 1 and 2, plus you get restructured as a nonprofit.

    Offense 4 within 5 years of the third would be the entire management board's and executive team's browser, chat, email, and dating app history gets published...

  • source
  • parent