I believe everyone who feels different than their AGAB and identifies as something different is valid as a trans person. Why would someone need to have gender dysphoria or scientific proof to be valid in their identity.

If you think this or something like it why do you? I want to hear from people who think this, and no I don't agree with them at all. I'm am against transmedicalism aggressively. I just want to understand why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 6 days ago

Im not medicalist, everyone is allowed to have their experience, whether u feel one way or the other, as long as u r not telling one side or the other they r wrong, cause we only have our own experiences and then science data also, we dont live in others shoes. So Im not saying im trans medicalist. But from what I have heard, part of it is that it’s cause it’s covered under insurance only because it’s considered life saving medically necessary treatment to trans people with dysphoria. So the treatment relieves the dysphoria that saves their life and quality of life. But if u have no dysphoria and can live without transitioning and be ok, and it’s not distressing to not do it. Then they feel there’s no case that can be made for it to be covered under insurance for those without dysphoria, who it won’t be medically necessary life saving treatment for. That’s what I’ve heard many times. Part of it anyway.

  • source