you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    they had both house and senate in 2019-2023

    From the article:

    Control of the Senate shifted over to a 50-50 party split on Wednesday as Democratic Georgia Senators Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock were both sworn in as the 49th and 50th Democratic senators, leaving Vice President Kamala Harris as the deciding vote should the chambers' votes ever end in a tie.

    50-50 split with Republicans potentially posing as Democrats is a pretty weak level of absolute control, but you're technically correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago

    Yeah thats pretty much been it. Since Reagan both parties had a trifecta three times each. Democrats have always had a few spoilers on anything (Sinema, Manchin, fetterman types) and razor thin margins. Republicans are much more likely to vote lockstep unless someone (Collins) can do a vote against for show. They also have had more years with a trifecta total.

    Thats not even factoring in the supreme court bullshit we've had going on since Bush.

    The thing is we've already seen that voting matters. Republicans always showed up and voted for the furthest right. That made more of them keep fucking going right. Meanwhile progressives stay home because "theyre not good enough" and that Overton window just keeps going.

    If the working class would show the fuck up and always vote for the most left, we could make that Overton window shift further and further left.

  • source
  • parent