you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Clearly refers to War in Donbas.

Eastern Ukraine is full of ethnic Russians (38%) and Russia-aligned eastern Ukrainians, and so when the central Ukrainian government went through the coup in 2014 and practically severed ties with Russia, many were genuinely unhappy with the government, so much so that they wanted to leave the country.

Seizing the opportunity, Russian paramilitary entered Crimea first (with Russians being the majority on the peninsula, people's support was practically guaranteed), and then tried to do the same on Donbas.

Ukrainian government was obviously not happy about this, and already knew what inaction leads to (total Russian annexation) and launched a military campaign to maintain control of Donbas. To many people of Donbas, however, this was seen not as a unification of a country, but as a brutal suppression of people's will, and so locals commonly sided with the local and Russian paramilitary groups in search of independence or ascension into Russia.

As such, many pro-Russian folks cite this as an act of aggression on the side of Ukraine, one that Russia merely responded to in full in 2022. This sentiment is often supported by Donbas locals, who suffered through severe civilian losses during the 2014-2022 phase of the conflict, many fleeing their home to find refuge in Russia.

This sentiment is not, however, so enthusiastically shared by the rest of the Ukrainians, who suddenly had this war come to their doorstep, escalating the conflict to an all-out war with 40 million Ukrainians in the crosshairs. And then Russia took the mask off, adding layer upon layer of bullshit explanations as to why the whole of Ukraine should lose statehood and become occupied.

What started as "we defend these 6 million people, including over 2 million Russians, from an unjustified act of aggression" turned to "we deny 40 million people independence and statehood, and we're ready to destroy everything to have it our way".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 days ago

    Russia's proposal for UN peacekeeping forces in the UN was quite informative.

    On September 5, 2017, the Russian Federation submitted a draft resolution to the UN Security Council (Document S/2017/754) proposing the establishment of a UN support mission.

    ​The details of the motion and its ultimate failure centered around where the peacekeepers would be stationed:

    ​The Russian Proposal: Russia proposed that UN peacekeepers be deployed strictly along the "line of contact" (the frontline) separating Ukrainian government forces and Russian-backed separatists. The stated goal of the resolution was to protect the unarmed observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) who were monitoring the conflict.

    ​The Backlash: Ukraine, the United States, and several European nations rejected the terms of the Russian draft. They argued that placing peacekeepers only on the frontline would effectively freeze the conflict and solidify the borders of the separatist-controlled territories.

    ​Ukraine's Counter-Demand: Ukraine and its allies insisted that any UN peacekeeping force must be deployed throughout the entire Donbas region—most importantly, along the international border between Ukraine and Russia. Monitoring the international border was viewed as critical to stopping the undetected flow of Russian troops, weapons, and supplies to the separatists.

    ​Because of this fundamental disagreement over the scope and location of the mandate, the Russian motion stalled in the Security Council and no UN peacekeeping mission was ever deployed to the Donbas.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

    What started as “we defend these 6 million people, including over 2 million Russians, from an unjustified act of aggression” turned to “we deny 40 million people independence and statehood, and we’re ready to destroy everything to have it our way”.

    you say this like russia has already annexed the whole of ukraine. you cannot be certain of what russia wants until a peace deal is signed. and more accurately, the war was started by the west, and the west benefits most from the continuance of the war. in fact, the ukrainians would have a higher standard of living under russia simply because the west has made ukraine so in debt that the taxes on locals have been onerous, ukraine has been depopulating since. and fun fact, the creditor debt holiday ends in 2027 which will force ukraine to begin paying lavish amounts to the west. we'll see how long the war continues...

  • source
  • parent