On Saturday, Oct. 24, Josh Turek, the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Iowa, released a new ad targeting transgender people—perhaps the worst anti-transgender ad of the entire election cycle to come from a Democrat. The ad begins with Turek talking about his disability and the importance of not discriminating, before immediately turning to adopt discriminatory policies toward transgender people. One such policy is a sports ban, a position sadly becoming increasingly common among high-profile Democrats in competitive races, and one that alone would have made this yet another newsworthy anti-trans ad. But Turek then goes further, advocating for a new policy: a proposal to ban federally funded gender-affirming care in the United States, one that would impact a substantial number of transgender people and make their care difficult to impossible to receive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

I don't know what the polls say on this issue, but if the Democrats throw trans people to the wolves, it's because their "donors" said to; polling is only relevant if Amazon agrees.

For example, polls show support for term limits is 83%; it doesn't matter, because Meta doesn't want term limits. I could list ten issues with over 80% support from all Americans; they've wanted these very basic no-brainer things for DECADES.

Just like labor discovered long ago, Democrats (or Rs, bOtH sIdEs, etc) will abandon any issue for enough "donations".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    There was a massive study from princeton over a decade ago showing that since the end of the civil rights era, not a single piece of public policy reflected public opinion.

    The conclusion was that there is no evidence that the US is a democracy, and it explicitly said we've functionally been an oligarchy since the 70s.

  • source
  • parent