In Switzerland, signatures are currently being collected to get a popular initiative off the ground that would anchor the protection of fundamental rights and democracy in the digital space in the Federal Constitution.
At first glance, the initiative sounds good and sensible to me personally. But I wonder:
To what extent would the legal article below cause problems for the Fediverse?

Initiative's website: https://www.internet-initiative.ch/initiative/

The initiative text, translated into English:

Federal popular initiative β€œFor the Protection of Fundamental Rights and Democracy in the Digital Space (Internet Initiative)”
The Federal Constitution is amended as follows:
Art. 93a Protection in the digital space

The Confederation shall enact provisions on the protection of fundamental rights and of democratic decision-making processes in the digital space.
It shall oblige providers of communication platforms and search engines, as well as providers that generate content by means of automated or artificial-intelligence-based systems:
a. to protect people from violations of their fundamental rights;
b. to prevent the dissemination of content that contains sexualised violence, incites violence, or glorifies violence;
c. to limit systemic risks with regard to the manipulation of democratic decision-making processes, in particular through disinformation or algorithmic amplification;
d. to protect the population from cybercrime.
Providers shall be obliged to examine, free of charge, reports of violations of their obligations under paragraph 2, to take the necessary countermeasures, and to report publicly on this. The Confederation shall regulate the procedures and the supervision of providers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Seems to me this article is aimed at the national government?!

Basically, this is a popular initiative. It's a mechanism in Switzerland through which the citizen can submit their own proposals for constitutional amendments, which the people then vote on and is binding when accepted.

Usually this is used in the manner seen here, where the constitutional amendment requires the government to enact certain legislation.

Ultimately any legislation to come of this will be subjected to a referendum if people care about it enough. So I'm not too worried personally.

  • source
  • parent