you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

An ssl certificate provider used 4 as their private key. This should be hundreds of characters long. Somebody figured this out and was able to issue their own certificates based on it. This results in loss of trust in their certificates which is a big deal.

It is compared as bigger than one of the largest security issues in IT the last couple of years since it forces everybody to patch their shit to not trust this certificate chain. And lots of stuff aren't patched that easily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I bet they used 0000000000…004

    See, hundreds of digits long!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I mean …. Yes, that would be secure.

    Sorta.

    It’s be dumb, and a pattern based attack could potentially solve it easily … but technically much more secure than 4

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I get what you mean, but no, it would not be secure. The private key in question is really used as a number in a calculation, not as a string of digits. Leading zeroes would just be ignored.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment