64
ICANN testing tech to let law enforcement access non-public WHOIS info (www.theregister.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Stinks that it's hard to set up a new internet. I've got nothing to hide but I don't like being watched like this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I've got nothing to hide

    Thats an invalid statement - Everyone has something to hide.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    new internet

    You're doing resistant wrong.
    You need distributenet.
    Homomorphically encrypted from the top.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    whats your opinion on gnunet?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago

    It solves the immediate query problem ICANN is enabling, but it doesn't solve the screen and chair problem with bad actors. When people think “I want to watch a movie!” They don't go “Cinema XYZ has listing FOHO at times XX:XX:XX during XX on XX.” They go “movie name, year, genre.”
    Networks need to be design around utility, not fascist markers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent