▲ 236 ▼ Don’t Want to Spend Time With Your Kids? Train an AI Voice Model of Yourself to Read Them Bedtime Stories: Parent-child bonding time isn't so sacred that it can't be optimized with AI. (futurism.com) submitted 1 month ago by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] halfapage@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago Simpsons Futurama did it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (5 children) Hell, why even choose to live? Humans are so inefficient. Just stop existing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (4 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago Can we opt to "live" in the Matrix? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago Simpsons Futurama did it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (5 children) Hell, why even choose to live? Humans are so inefficient. Just stop existing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (4 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (4 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (4 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago Can we opt to "live" in the Matrix? permalink fedilink source parent