you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -14 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Lol I wouldn't brag on the blocs comrade, there are many problems with them.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    despite all their issues, they are preferable to homelessness

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    Yeah no shit. Literally everything has ups and downs. The USSR just got through a world war against a power that was trying to genocide and colonise their land. Entire cities were destroyed. Millions were made homeless. Commie blocks were a good thing and yet they're shat on. Like what else were they meant to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 38 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    During great depression, they were called Hoovervilles. I say we bring it back, call them Trumpvilles

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago*

    Looking at old pics of Hoovervilles is depressing. They were so much nicer than modern homeless encampments. I’m talking real wooden cabins, built on a grid, with stoves/chimneys, and even mailboxes/actual mail service. People who were homeless during the Great Depression were better off than people who are homeless now, because the larger community tolerated them rather than constantly sweeping them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    One has nothing to do with the other? I thought we were talking about blocs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments