37
Why are shadow libraries so slow for few days? (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Like the top speed I'm getting is 6 KB/s from libgen and zlibrary. And downloads fail midway. And they didn't provide torrent download for single books. Any recommended place to torrent books?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

If you need to move the document bulk, you can either rsync the docs and repin them, or use IPFS native means of replication to remote -- haven't used those.

LibGen on IPFS used to work, try e.g. https://bafybeifaxsen4np54stc43phpnn3rh2crxie34d74yki43dultrh4vglqy/ -- but I have no idea about how much of the library corpus is pinned currently.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    For me, except that it's kind of complicated to set up, this is what is missing with IPFS, the repin (or "cid" stuff IIRC) is breaking the decentralised part. It's "almost" decentralised, but not quite.

    Tenfingers is fully decentralised (it's also very rugged against takedowns), you can just update the data without the need to change or regenerate the link, but it doesn't work well with large datasets (a GB is already on the big side).

    For me, a mix of them would be the best of worlds, large data that doesnt change: IPFS, small data that changes: Tenfingers, Large data that changes: IPFS links shared with Tenfingers (so that you can publish the new IPFS links easily).

    I have approached IPFS users, but many doesn't think it's a problem that needs a solution.

    What do you think?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent