you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -14 points 1 month ago* (14 children)

Not playing in the street is a sacrifice?! LMAO!

Fuck airports for not letting children play on the tarmac!

😂

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    When kids don’t have any other places to go? Yes I’d say it’s a sacrifice. There’s no reason for quiet suburban streets to have speeds as high as 50km/h, which can kill kids if they get hit, especially by oversized american trucks and SUVs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Kids have plenty of places to play. Stop making shit up so you can feel like you’re making a point. It’s fucking stupid to think kids should be playing in streets!

    Ffs. You people are entirely out of arguments to make if this is a hill even worth fighting over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    You open the garage door before you rev your engine, do you understand?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    No. LMAO! I don’t. I don’t even want to do the pre-stretching workout before attempting the mental gymnastics required to connect those dots.

    Kids shouldn’t play in streets because of traffic. For there to be no traffic, there’s would need to be no cars. If there are no cars, there’s be no need for streets for them to play in. If there were no streets for kids to play in, you’d probably whine about that and find a way to blame some other dumb shit for the lack of stress for kids to play in.

    And before tighter and say this is the point…. Bullshit. That isn’t even remotely what this ridiculous meme is saying. It’s a pure example of not thinking before you assume you have a point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    Kids would actually play in quiet neighborhood streets or cul-de-sacs and the like. Drivers would drive slower because they knew kids would be playing, and kids would all get out of the way when one of them heard or saw a car.

    "Street Hockey" was a thing.

    I'm not sure exactly why, but it's not really a thing anymore. Seems like there are more cars and the quiet neighbourhood streets are more likely to be considered "shortcuts" these days. And where I live, there's little traffic enforcement, so rather than driving the speed limit (or less in areas where kids might be playing), people are happily speeding while playing with screens and devices in their cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    It’s not a thing anymore because of The internet. Not cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    There are a lot of reasons, but more cars on the road making playing on the road less viable is definitely a factor

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Again, playing on roads shouldn’t be a thing. There is a reason why cars aren’t allowed to drive through playgrounds.

    Fucking common sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Cars don't drive through playgrounds because that would be dangerous for the playground equipment and the children and adults in there.

    So kids playing on roads shouldn't be a thing because kids are dangerous to cars and the road infrastructure?

    That's not a good analogy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments