you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 52 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Yet they were denied access again. Too bad there aren't any punishments for ignoring the judicial system.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    There are if the judge has the balls to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I guess it depends on how you interpret the “official acts” SCOTUS ruling. Was him barring journalists an official act? If so, he can’t be prosecuted for defying the courts. The SCOTUS truly created a dictator with that ruling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Deputize someone as a marshal and have them arrested for contempt of court.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    like a us marshal? could existing marshals just go do it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments