anyone else feel that AI has sucked all joy out of the open source world?

i used to scroll fdroid when I'm bored and it was so exciting sometimes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Career-wise, even the usual insider mouthpieces are starting to agree that AI won’t kill CS:

But yeah, AI has definitely scorched the FOSS landscape. We will somehow figure out a way though.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I heard people being concerned that a job in CS would change from writing code to fixing bugs in AI code, and that sounds dreadful

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    A company i applied for and had 2 interviews at, is planing to do that...idk if i rather want to be homeless or do that and get lots money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    For me getting 3k net is lots. Even more than i could spend

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    Someone close to me is an accountant, and is facing layoffs, downsizing, and much-longer working hours, as management pushes remaining staff to use more and more AI in accounting analysis and reporting. Trying to get one accountant to accomplish what used to take several.

    I'm surprised at the inclusion of "accounting" on this list.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    There are generally only so many jobs that really need a CS degree, more people hold the degree than are needed and the usual catchment path of 'IT Janitorial' is being eaten by AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I was recently listening to a Cory Doctorow interview where he was discussing the concept of "reverse centaurs". Essentially, if a centaur is a human who uses technology to perform a task they cannot alone, a reverse centaur is the opposite. Think amazon warehouse workers. An algorithm tells the worker where to pick up the box, and where to put it down. It does all the thinking, and the human is just a pair of hands.

    One path you can take is that you have skilled professionals who have a depth of knowledge in their field, and can skillfully use an AI to enhance their work. The AI can for example, proof-read human made code and look for typos, bugs, or other possible mistakes that we all as humans occasionally make. This is a centaur situation, where the human is in the driver's seat.

    The other path is that corporations can have fewer skilled professionals in fields that were previously difficult to automate. AI allows you to fire 90% of those professionals and the ones that remain are essentially glorified amazon warehouse workers who do the bidding of the AI. They hit enter on the keyboard, they sign off on the code, and they most importantly fall on the sword when the AI fails. This is the reverse centaur situation

    So while these jobs may be "safe" from AI, it's important that we avoid the reverse-centaur path. Though with corpos' tendency to chase profit over all else, this might be a big ask.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)