335
KDE is actively proposing a Pro-AI contribution policy, with most rejecting any suggestions for AI use to be disclosed, or any consideration for environmental concerns (invent.kde.org)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
😭 2
 

Direct link to the LLM Policy Discussion: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/work_items/187

Example of KDE dev rejecting environmental consideration:

Example of KDE devs not wanting to require LLM use be disclosed.

And all of this is coming right after the debacle with an AI slop project being allowed to give a presentation at Akademy, and the person asking how this was allowed being blocked by KDE:

https://lemmy.nz/post/42029517

as well as the discussion thread bringing up legitimate concerns about AI usage being closed:

https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333/164

As someone who genuinely loves KDE, and has even donated to the project multiple times, I sadly have to accept that the majority of KDE have hopped onto the Pro-AI train, and they will not be dissuaded otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 1 month ago (10 children)

AI is not a thing, it doesn't act, it doesn't think. Humans do. Humans nudify children, humans enshitify software, humans steal content

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Exactly.

    All of the Anti-AI people are actually anti-capitalists, they're just not finished diagnosing the problem.

    AI isn't building data centers, capitalists are. They're doing it in such a destructive and rapid manner because they're trying to leverage their infinite amount of cash into a future monopoly. If it wasn't AI it would have been some other product.

    Fighting the product and ignoring the actual human beings who are making these destructive decisions is only adding to the smoke screen that shifts blame away from names like Huang, Altman, and Musk.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I think you can be anticapitalist and also anti-AI. I'm certainly both

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I think you can be anticapitalist and also anti-AI. I’m certainly both

    Yes, the venn is basically a circle.

    All of the 'bad things AI is doing' are bad things that capitalists are doing.

    Nobody is actually angry at AI for solving age old mathematical problems, folding proteins or locating cancers. It's not the technology that people care about.

    People are angry at rapacious capitalism and are misdirecting it at the technology and not the rapacious capitalists. Anti-AI is just Anti-Capitalism for new leftists.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    it doesn’t act,

    I don't disagree with anything else you are saying or the sentiment, but with the rise of "AI Agents" it is becoming more common that the AI actually does something. It seems like there is a new story every few days about an agent deleting an entire database or buying plane tickets or sending an e-mail to the FBI. Unfortunately, we have people giving it more and more permissions and ability to "just act" and it is only getting worse.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    You sound like "Guns don't kill people! Robbers do!"

    So I'm going to ask you, would you give a gun to a child? Would you? Just answer that

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •