An accelerationist wants capital accumulated in the hands of capitalists as quickly as possible, so as to ensure the contradictions of capitalism to occur as quickly as possible. Therefore an accelerationist would vote for whichever they considered to be the most competent capitalist - in most eyes, that would be Kamala.
Accelerationism is not just "when you want a thing to happen faster".

It's literally telling the Democrats to run, not walk, in the OTHER DIRECTION. If you don't communicate that, then, they accelerate in the wrong direction. Essentially voting for them no matter what their policy is the accelerationism.

Because the goal is not to make the situation worse with the hope of later making the situation better. The goal is to hold people accountable for supporting genocide. The point is that we shouldn't be afraid of a short-term loss, because that can lead to superior long-term improvement. We shouldn't let the fear of a short-term loss prevent us from making the morally right decision today.

Accelerationism would be deliberately seeking to collapse the current Democratic party. For example, by convincing a bunch of Democrats to stay home, not out of any real response to their actions, but simply because Democrats losing could shake up the political structure.

The key difference is that one is simply not allowing the fear of being labeled "accelerationist" to prevent us from the right decision, while the latter is actually accelerationism.

Accelerationism is meant to have a very specific meaning. Unfortunately, it gets used as a cudgel to argue that every short-term win must be obtained at any cost, even at the cost of superior long-term success.

Let's pump more CO2 to the air so the next ice age comes faster as a response overheating so we suffer the calamity instead of our grandchildren!!

You are here playing 4D chess when they are playing 5+1D (I'm not there at all, just watching and getting side fucked by the crumbling world morality)

Wrong, and there’s literally decades of legislation that you can review to see for yourself.

Yeah, decades of things like:

• Foreign interventions
• More fracking
• No universal healthcare.
• No codified Roe v Wade.
• increased police budgets
• Increased military spending
• Crackdowns on peaceful protesters
• Legislation making it illegal to be homeless
• Just straight up genocide

But hey, at least they'll sign the Paris Agreement (they wont do anything to actually achieve the goals set out by it though), so you can feel good about yourself as the president drone-strikes another wedding

Sure, tell yourself that as nothing of real significance actually changes. The Democrats passed better legislation.