you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 51 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Their later solution to this problem is interesting: for a long time the search and ad teams were entirely separate. The search team had one mission and that was to make Google search as good as possible. Selling ads and making money was someone else's task. The old reasoning of "Make a really good product and then the profit will follow". This is how Google search was able to outcompete all it's competitors.

Then 2019 rolled around, the Google Ads team failed to meet objectives, and they blamed Google search for their failure. Google's solution was to make search worse, reduce the visual difference between ads and results, and eventually put the ads guy officially in charge of search. The goal of Google search had changed from making the best search engine possible to optimizing ad views and clicks. This is one of the best documented stories of enshittification imo.

Good reads about this:
https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/
https://codingwithcody.com/2025/10/search-is-dead-google-killed-it/

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I think they also discovered they were charging companies for all the blocked ads nobody saw, and were about to get sued into oblivion, so they refunded a token amount, and threw ads into overdrive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I think ads were never paid by the dished out links, but by the actual opens. sometimes even only by the click on it (impression vs click).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Google 'charges for YouTube adverts viewed by bots' Published 23 September 2015

    I think this lead the charge to confirm you’re a human, i.e. age confirmation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment