you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I need 27 suppressors for my 27 guns. Ever thought of that? Didn't think so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think if you put 27 suppressors in series, the bullet wouldn't even make it out. You'd have to point your 12 foot long handgun down and shake it!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And why do I need 27 guns? That's right, for my 27 hands. Betcha feel real silly now, huh buster?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    one for each pocket, and 1-2 strapped on the ankles, and 1 on the thighs, one for the belt,etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Which makes sense to do because drawing another flintlock pistol is much, much faster than trying to reload one.

    Modern bandoliers have shotgun shells , modern assault rigs carry spare magazines...pirates didn't have firearms with magazines that could take a new mag or stripper clip, so, their bandoliers just held more guns.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    For sure, hunting rifles can benefit from suppression as well, and plinking guns too if you're not in an indoor range.

    What's more I'd only want a can on my defensive rifles. On the handguns I'll eat the hearing damage before I stick 4"-7" more in the front of my pants, it's crowded as is, and that draw would be crazy lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)