you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Is this why he wanted to change the bestality rules in the FBI?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    You joke but some high ranking FBI official probably fucked a goat and they had to retrospectively change the rule to protect him...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    You know..I watched that clip and for the first half I couldn't stop laughing. Granted, I was high as fuck...but the comedic timing was uncanny throughout the whole interaction.

    But once Kash explained himself, it sort of made sense. I hate myself for saying that...but I said it, so there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Thing is, I’m not sure you can really be a victim of bestiality. Bestiality is sexually abusing an animal, and if the human is being coerced, they are being sexually abused - by the person who is coercing this.

    So a victim of bestiality properly adjudicated wouldn’t even have anything on their record, I should think.

    So what the fuck?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm generally not sure if you can separate the coercion from the physical act, as the victim is fucking the goat after all, even if under duress. They are a victim of that crime.

    However, I'm also mindful this conversation is rather close to the entire, can a women rape a man if the man gets a nob on during the event.

    I suppose the pertinent question becomes is it more likely this adminstration cares about the victims of bestiality or more likely someone was filmed fucking a goat or throating a horse.

    They are trying to bury the case by retrospectively changing the rules, clearly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    ...he talked about their own fucking canine units being involved in this. Even if somehow some prospective FBI employee was coerced into committing beastiality...do you really want people who can be manipulated into actions like that to be working at the FBI.

    Nothing he said makes a single bit of sense if you actually think about it, it can only be interpreted as them being okay with beastiality or them being okay with easily compromisable FBI agents...do you really think either of those options are acceptable?

  • source
  • parent