Please point to modern processors or SoC available to consumers that does not have these subprocessors.
The IBM power 9 is one, but it’s red herring anyway because you’re still looking to weasel out of acknowledging that the only relevent comparison is the same chip with and without an spychip. Looking to other chips is nothing more than a futile attempt to hide the fact that spychip is not wasting energy. I doubt you will find an audience naive enough to buy your nonsense.. but if you find them, sell them a bridge.
technology needs change.
Not this change.
Again, you are spouting emotional, uninformed garbage.
Again, your stance is driven by emotion as you continue to fail to justify your closed-source support-needy garbage.
There is no technical definition of attack surface that would classify commingled processing as better than bifurcated processing.
It doesn’t need to. An attack surface definition that attempts classification would be a broken definition by someone attempting shenanigans to hide their attack surface. Someone hoping to bullshit consumers who don’t want extra vulns and then being at the mercy of the corporate supplier’s will to fix.
I honestly believe that you are being paid to post this stuff to sabotage real beneficial collaboration.
You can test that theory by actually putting forward an effective logical argument that actually justifies your position. You can only blame yourself for failing to articulate a sensible idea.