2 comments is a rabbit hole. Wow. I wanted to know what modern options you think actually exist, to make that apples to apples comparison you demanded. And you point to something that's explicitly EOL. Your only example is non-consumer hardware.
You
You can’t hide the spychip’s waste by choosing processors of different effeciencies from different time periods.
Me
point to modern processors or SoC available to consumers
I should have said “designed for” instead of “available to”.
You are fearmongering about these things when there are no real consumer alternatives, and the impact is imagined. You are expecting a charity to not set reasonable cutoffs for interoperability. Completely asinine. Every new comment from you has histrionic allusions. I hope you are burning tokens responding to my comments.