you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

They've always been though. Why this development now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Because you can now just insert a disc into a blue BluRay drive (which you'll have needed to rip them to disk anyway) on your PC to play them: just like on a real PS3.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Why did it take 20 years to happen? is the question

    Edit: Previling philsophy of history: things just kind of happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If I had to guess, randomly accessing the storage on the disc takes a lot more overhead time compared to reading from an internal drive. Now the emulator is so fast that it can handle the seek time on top of emulating the console.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Fat PS3 was only capable of 1X - 2X Bluray read ~9MB/s while Slim and Super Slim were capable of 6X ~27MB/s (changes over the surface of the disc of course) so I don't think that's it. PS3 used a rather shitty BSD FAT32 driver for their 5400rpm laptop drives and SSD upgrades were better but still heavily bottlenecked by said driver.

    I can load a decrypted ISO directly in RPSC3 over 1 Gigabit ethernet from a NAS with that inherent horrendous latency (compared to local storage drives, especially random access) and it'll still load faster than a game would on an actual PS3 on either or even combined storage mediums like many games partial installed to HDD and also used Bluray.

  • source
  • parent