832
I rented a car, and within hours, my driver's license was for sale (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
190 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 44 points 2 months ago (28 children)

That’s the issue. We don’t need nanny’s to age gate us on the internet. All it does is create a very short path to removing anonymity on the internet

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
    •
  • [+] -33 points 2 months ago (27 children)

    Don't mind some age gating tbh. It would have to be pretty convenient and anonymous though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
    •
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (24 children)

    How do you imagine it will be anonymous? Or convenient, for that matter.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
    •
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Easy. You set the age in the os (or age range) per system account.

    Apps can then request this and allow/ deny based on it. Requires admin / sudo to update age range.

    No need for 3rd parties, id or anything else.

    If parents are concerned about it they can implement it easily. If not, they can ignore it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    So any unchecked web/app developer can see if a child is visiting their site? No thanks. This will make children less safe.

    I will VPN to mars before I upload my ID, or that of my child for that matter. Not a chance in hell.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    But it needs to be verified there first in some way, and then services will need to somehow verify that your device properly verified it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    And which of those systems are secure themselves, oses and their manufacturers - the answer is none. None are secure enough to trust that private information on mandatory verification systems. Not the base systems nor any systems that would share any approval tokens.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -17 points 2 months ago* (14 children)

    Well the implementation is going to be that you prove your age to the id app that only saves the info that you're over 18. Then the id app just tells that info to the website (or app or whatever I guess). So the site doesn't know who is trying to prove their age or even what their age is, just that they're over 18.

    It would be nice to have that sort of quick and easy app for verifying your personal information too. I don't think we have one where I live. We always use a bank for that and that's more hassle than I'd like

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    And how would that app verify you've given your actual age? Now you need to deanonymize yourself to that app and while random sites might not know who you are the app does and the app also knows every site you visit (that requests your age).

    So no, that's no longer anonymous. In practice that's just your government (as that's the most likely source of authority to verify your age) tracking what you're doing on the web. Is that really preferable to parents parenting their children?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    The app is from the government and open source at every endpoint. You can see for yourself that it doesn’t track activity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    the government would never do that

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    I'd be more worried if the apps were closed source but the ones I've heard about that are making an actual implementation of the protocol are open source so you can see everything it is doing, who it is contacting etc

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    if you can even verify it, unlike the proposed EU identity app that adds in all the obfuscation, and anti-debugging DRM of the world, also denying operation on any device and operating system not directly made by one of the two tech monopolies in the field.

    but that is not only what you should worry about. even with an actually auditable app, they just change it one day and practically nobody bats an eye. the common person can not and will not check anything, it updates automatically and thry know nothing. if they don't comply, they are immediately excluded from half the world. the thing is auditability is a nice plus, but doesn't actually matter, because it requires a fully benevolent government. if they want to push through a change, they can roll it out in 5 minutes across the whole country and no businesses can defy it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    You can use a driver's license or your bank. Different methods to verify it to the app. After verification, the app won't save the info, just the knowledge that you're over 18.

    the app also knows every site you visit (that requests your age)

    Not much of a worry locally. Disabling history is probably included in this (sort of porn mode/incognito, same as your browser). The info isn't much use locally anyway

    In practice that’s just your government (as that’s the most likely source of authority to verify your age) tracking what you’re doing on the web.

    Government knows you've verified the app but they don't know what you're using the app for, it doesn't have phone home. Your app is giving the site a generated cryptographic key, the site compares that to see if it is a valid key and then accepts it. The key doesn't carry your personal info with it, so the central db doesn't know who is being asked about, just whether the key is valid (so someone is 18+)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

    Now you've got a system without oversight. A child just needs an adult key and everything gets bypassed. And before you think it won't be done, I know from my childhood children who used their older sibling identification to buy alcohol without the older sibling even knowing it was being done. Kids are creative and they will find a way to bypass something without oversight. That arguably will put them in even greater danger because while kids are creative they're not that great at assessing dangers. For example a bad actor could give keys to kids and then use that same key as blackmail to control them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    The child would need to get the app and have it verified (id and face scan, bank logins).

    I know kids steal or fake ids but yeah not a reason imo to not card people hah

    a bad actor could give keys to kids and then use that same key as blackmail to control them.

    How would that work, be around to verify with the app or something?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I know kids steal or fake ids but yeah not a reason imo to not card people hah

    This whole post exists because the need to card people and then use that card to verify that person and how it opens up the door for your identifiable information getting stolen.

    The child would need to get the app and have it verified (id and face scan, bank logins).

    How would that work, be around to verify with the app or something?

    The way your proposed solution works is that the verification process is asynchronous. The government verifies the identity in the app and then the app is used to verify identity elsewhere. Those are two separate steps that don't happen in succession. There's bound to be some time between the two steps if for no other reason than for the government to push the new key into third party databases (because if it uses the pull method then you've reintroduced government tracking. That means there's a timeframe where person A verifies themselves, gives the key to person B and then person B uses the key until it expires. Now you need to start building in safeguards to prevent keys from leaking from within the app.

    I'll ask a counter-question since my point was is it really preferable to parents parenting. How complex (which increases how costly the development will be) and how inconvenient does it have to get for you to consider that perhaps parenting is a better solution? Because I'll also add this, this solution doesn't prevent "bad parenting" because a bad parent can just identify themselves and let children use their identification to bypass whatever the kids want to bypass.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm against sending pictures of your card. Just showing your card to a shopkeeper, that's fine imo.

    I don't think there being a delay once you originally setup the app is a big issue or takes more than a few minutes max. You do that first time and then your phone is generating the key based on the master key, the site confirms the key with the central server. That sort of handshake or what it is called happens almost instantly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •