โฒ 970 โผ Google Has Removed Manifest V2 Extensions From the Chrome Web Store, Including uBlock Origin (webiterate.dev) submitted 2 months ago by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 214 comments fedilink hide all child comments ๐ก 1
[โ] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 1 point 2 months ago (5 children) I have to say I'm not surprised. No one wants to pay for a browser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [โ] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) The irony is that Chrome's rendering engine was a fork of WebKit, which was a fork of KHTML, a free and open source rendering engine created by KDE for Konqueror. They basically took something free, used Microsoft's "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics on it. Now KHTML is vestigial, only found in the UserAgent string. But we could have had a truly free open source cross platform browser with Konqueror. Best we have now is Firefox, but the bulk of Mozilla's development funding comes from setting Google as the default search. So it is also hijackable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 1 point 2 months ago I think it's the shear cost of operating a browser. I would hope Mozilla are looking to diversity there income but without ads or sales to end users I'm not sure where it can go. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago In circa 2003-2004, it was as close to on par with browsers at the time as it would get. I think the WebKit fork did damage to the momentum. By 2008 with KDE4, the rework that split it and Dolphin into to products was basically the final nail I think, as development work effectively stopped. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago If you pay, do you get a say or is it the same play but you paid? permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) The irony is that Chrome's rendering engine was a fork of WebKit, which was a fork of KHTML, a free and open source rendering engine created by KDE for Konqueror. They basically took something free, used Microsoft's "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics on it. Now KHTML is vestigial, only found in the UserAgent string. But we could have had a truly free open source cross platform browser with Konqueror. Best we have now is Firefox, but the bulk of Mozilla's development funding comes from setting Google as the default search. So it is also hijackable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 1 point 2 months ago I think it's the shear cost of operating a browser. I would hope Mozilla are looking to diversity there income but without ads or sales to end users I'm not sure where it can go. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago In circa 2003-2004, it was as close to on par with browsers at the time as it would get. I think the WebKit fork did damage to the momentum. By 2008 with KDE4, the rework that split it and Dolphin into to products was basically the final nail I think, as development work effectively stopped. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 1 point 2 months ago I think it's the shear cost of operating a browser. I would hope Mozilla are looking to diversity there income but without ads or sales to end users I'm not sure where it can go. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago In circa 2003-2004, it was as close to on par with browsers at the time as it would get. I think the WebKit fork did damage to the momentum. By 2008 with KDE4, the rework that split it and Dolphin into to products was basically the final nail I think, as development work effectively stopped. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago In circa 2003-2004, it was as close to on par with browsers at the time as it would get. I think the WebKit fork did damage to the momentum. By 2008 with KDE4, the rework that split it and Dolphin into to products was basically the final nail I think, as development work effectively stopped. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago If you pay, do you get a say or is it the same play but you paid? permalink fedilink source parent