you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 71 points 2 months ago (7 children)

company which makes most of it's revenue from advertising fucks with their browser's ability to remove ads. Go figure!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 15 points 2 months ago

    i am surprised it took this long, but i know that getting everybody using chromium, or at least webextensions, was part of the plan that had to exist first. and the path down mv3 started not long after both mozilla and microsoft were both roped-in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    I have to say I'm not surprised. No one wants to pay for a browser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The irony is that Chrome's rendering engine was a fork of WebKit, which was a fork of KHTML, a free and open source rendering engine created by KDE for Konqueror. They basically took something free, used Microsoft's "embrace, extend, extinguish" tactics on it. Now KHTML is vestigial, only found in the UserAgent string.

    But we could have had a truly free open source cross platform browser with Konqueror.

    Best we have now is Firefox, but the bulk of Mozilla's development funding comes from setting Google as the default search. So it is also hijackable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 1 month ago

    In circa 2003-2004, it was as close to on par with browsers at the time as it would get. I think the WebKit fork did damage to the momentum. By 2008 with KDE4, the rework that split it and Dolphin into to products was basically the final nail I think, as development work effectively stopped.

  • source
  • parent