▲ 295 ▼ Valve was founded 30 years ago — changed PC gaming forever with Half-Life, then Steam | Microsoft veterans Gabe Newell and Mike Harrington founded the company on August 24, 1996. (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 2 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (11 children) You can lend games on steam. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago (10 children) Really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (9 children) You can either create a family and share games that way or you can login on your friends computer and install the game. They can then borrow the game. You cannot play a game while your copy is being borrowed (played) by another user. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (8 children) Kinda. Unless it's excluded. And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they'd get kicked. Better than nothing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (5 children) And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they’d get kicked. If you are doing Steam Family Sharing, then the only limit is that you both cannot play the same game at the same time. You can play different games at the same time, even if they are both from your account. I use the feature all the time, it is great. Convinced my SO to buy a few games already as they tried it from my account, liked it, then bought their own copy so we could play it together. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (4 children) Oh is that so? actually never bother witu the sharing, was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted. OK even better then. Still far from optimal. You can't just gift a game away you don't want to play anymore. That would be big. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted This used to be the case, which is probably why you thought that. They improved the feature a few years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) That would be super cool if you could generate a unique code and once its redeemed its removed from your library. That certainly would he big! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Two people can play the same family share game if they are both in offline mode when they launch the game. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Obviously though, as they can't check the DRM 😊 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago (10 children) Really permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (9 children) You can either create a family and share games that way or you can login on your friends computer and install the game. They can then borrow the game. You cannot play a game while your copy is being borrowed (played) by another user. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (8 children) Kinda. Unless it's excluded. And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they'd get kicked. Better than nothing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (5 children) And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they’d get kicked. If you are doing Steam Family Sharing, then the only limit is that you both cannot play the same game at the same time. You can play different games at the same time, even if they are both from your account. I use the feature all the time, it is great. Convinced my SO to buy a few games already as they tried it from my account, liked it, then bought their own copy so we could play it together. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (4 children) Oh is that so? actually never bother witu the sharing, was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted. OK even better then. Still far from optimal. You can't just gift a game away you don't want to play anymore. That would be big. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted This used to be the case, which is probably why you thought that. They improved the feature a few years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) That would be super cool if you could generate a unique code and once its redeemed its removed from your library. That certainly would he big! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Two people can play the same family share game if they are both in offline mode when they launch the game. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Obviously though, as they can't check the DRM 😊 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (9 children) You can either create a family and share games that way or you can login on your friends computer and install the game. They can then borrow the game. You cannot play a game while your copy is being borrowed (played) by another user. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (8 children) Kinda. Unless it's excluded. And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they'd get kicked. Better than nothing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (5 children) And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they’d get kicked. If you are doing Steam Family Sharing, then the only limit is that you both cannot play the same game at the same time. You can play different games at the same time, even if they are both from your account. I use the feature all the time, it is great. Convinced my SO to buy a few games already as they tried it from my account, liked it, then bought their own copy so we could play it together. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (4 children) Oh is that so? actually never bother witu the sharing, was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted. OK even better then. Still far from optimal. You can't just gift a game away you don't want to play anymore. That would be big. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted This used to be the case, which is probably why you thought that. They improved the feature a few years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) That would be super cool if you could generate a unique code and once its redeemed its removed from your library. That certainly would he big! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Two people can play the same family share game if they are both in offline mode when they launch the game. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Obviously though, as they can't check the DRM 😊 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (8 children) Kinda. Unless it's excluded. And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they'd get kicked. Better than nothing though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (5 children) And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they’d get kicked. If you are doing Steam Family Sharing, then the only limit is that you both cannot play the same game at the same time. You can play different games at the same time, even if they are both from your account. I use the feature all the time, it is great. Convinced my SO to buy a few games already as they tried it from my account, liked it, then bought their own copy so we could play it together. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (4 children) Oh is that so? actually never bother witu the sharing, was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted. OK even better then. Still far from optimal. You can't just gift a game away you don't want to play anymore. That would be big. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted This used to be the case, which is probably why you thought that. They improved the feature a few years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) That would be super cool if you could generate a unique code and once its redeemed its removed from your library. That certainly would he big! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Two people can play the same family share game if they are both in offline mode when they launch the game. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Obviously though, as they can't check the DRM 😊 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (5 children) And if family member x plays one of my games, I cannot play a game or else they’d get kicked. If you are doing Steam Family Sharing, then the only limit is that you both cannot play the same game at the same time. You can play different games at the same time, even if they are both from your account. I use the feature all the time, it is great. Convinced my SO to buy a few games already as they tried it from my account, liked it, then bought their own copy so we could play it together. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (4 children) Oh is that so? actually never bother witu the sharing, was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted. OK even better then. Still far from optimal. You can't just gift a game away you don't want to play anymore. That would be big. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted This used to be the case, which is probably why you thought that. They improved the feature a few years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) That would be super cool if you could generate a unique code and once its redeemed its removed from your library. That certainly would he big! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (4 children) Oh is that so? actually never bother witu the sharing, was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted. OK even better then. Still far from optimal. You can't just gift a game away you don't want to play anymore. That would be big. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted This used to be the case, which is probably why you thought that. They improved the feature a few years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) That would be super cool if you could generate a unique code and once its redeemed its removed from your library. That certainly would he big! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) was adamant that it was account, not game-restricted This used to be the case, which is probably why you thought that. They improved the feature a few years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago Ahhh makes sense. As I never really used it it vanished off my radar. And rarely things get better than worse 🥴 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) That would be super cool if you could generate a unique code and once its redeemed its removed from your library. That certainly would he big! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* And it'd be so simple. Just like you said. But that would hurt sales and help you not to clutter your lib and poorer ppl get cool games too. Sigh.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Two people can play the same family share game if they are both in offline mode when they launch the game. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Obviously though, as they can't check the DRM 😊 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago Obviously though, as they can't check the DRM 😊 permalink fedilink source parent