you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (24 children)

wtf are pilots doing on that list? it has to be one of the safest professions, unless you count military ones and even then i am not sure it applies.

garbage men? are they fighting radioactive mutated rats, or what? fishermen? do they get drunk, fall into water and die, or what? truckers? what? why?

this comics is garbage.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Just because something is outside of your personal knowledge or experience doesn't mean it's wrong. You have access to the internet with plenty of information available on these topics. Strange to just assume the information is entirely incorrect without bothering to look into it.

    Here is a random article that comes up and links to a full database on the topic: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2023/03/02/most-dangerous-jobs-america-database/11264064002/

    You can certainly argue with data collection and such, but most related lists are pretty similar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Pilot surprised me as well. Thank you for the link. Here is the pilot section:

    2. Commercial pilots

    This does not include pilots of passenger planes for major airlines like you might use to travel for work or vacation. These folks navigate planes or helicopters to carry cargo and, in less common and less hazardous roles, lead air tours or navigate air ambulances. Nearly all deaths and injuries were caused by catastrophic crashes, which is why the nonfatal injury rate for the profession ranked low, at 297th.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Just because something is outside of your personal knowledge or experience doesn’t mean it’s wrong.

    just because you saw cool picture on the internet does not mean you have personal knowledge. i actually do have some knowledge, which is why i reacted.

    in 2025, there were 300056 (three hundred thousand) pilots with either cpl or atpl - these are pilots legally allowed to accept reward for piloting a plane.

    so it would seem that the tabloid story in usa today drawing some conclusion out of 37k "workers" - roughly 8 times smaller number, has very loose connection to reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I openly said you can take issue with the data collection, but the link makes clear they're talking about specific commercial pilots. My understanding is that the cpl and atpl do not expire. I have no idea how many of those people are in the workforce anymore, or in aviation at all, much less the specific segment in question.

    Even if you took that stat and spread it over all of aviation it'd still be more than cops, but just for fun here's an article using data from the bureau of labor and statistics. They happen to link pilots with flight engineers, but the pattern still holds: https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-police-officers-die-in-the-line-of-duty/

    You can disagree with whatever data collection or collation you want, but acting like the meme is misleading seems disingenuous, especially when you consider the brevity of the format.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I openly said you can take issue with the data collection

    thank you for your permission. my issue is more with studying small subset of the data carefully chosen to support your theory and then presenting it as if it applied to the whole group.

    but the link makes clear

    the link makes it anything but clear. it ultimately admits that the sample is manipulated, but doesn't say how and why.

    Even if you took that stat and spread it over all of aviation it’d still be more than cops

    it would be more than "no data"? 😂

    https://hostux.pics/images/2026/08/25/Screenshot-from-2026-08-25-14-27-0984d2800ddf65be81.png

    one number manipulated, one non-existent, but the conclusion is one is bigger than the other?

    acting like the meme is misleading seems disingenuous, especially when you consider the brevity of the format.

    the "meme" is tabloid trash. brevity of the format is not an excuse, no one forced the author to present misleading data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    10800 forestry workers in the us in 2024: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/farming-fishing-and-forestry/forest-and-conservation-workers.htm 53 deaths (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.t03.htm) = a death rate of about .5%, 1 in 200.

    826,800 police workers in the us in 2024: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/protective-service/police-and-detectives.htm

    132 deaths (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.t03.htm) = a death rate of about .02%, less than 1 in 2,000.

    Edit math and spelling, but check for yourself. Still the difference in magnitude is obvious and always has been.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    cool, but that doesn't really address my complain about pilots. i don't trust these numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    It is on the same website. Not always the same year.

    Working pilots: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/cwc/flying-too-high-workers-fatalities-in-the-aeronautics-field.pdf

    80.5 per 100k/ year

    Police: https://www.bls.gov/iif/factsheets/fatal-occupational-injuries-police-2018.htm

    13.7 per 100k/year

    No matter what year you find stats for, pilots outweigh police for death risk. Prove me wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    ok, fair. it seems i may have underestimated the number of the bush pilots, but i still insist that the presentation is confusing and it presents "specific subset of the pilots" as "pilots".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Only guess on pilots is heat attack.

    But Truckers? Come on that's a pretty easy one to figure out. Traffic deaths are probably the majority (most cop deaths are traffic deaths, not getting shot). Truckers also work around large moving trucks, and forklifts that have a massive solid steel counterweight on the back that will not notice when is grinds your pelvis into hamburger against the nearest warehouse column or concrete loading dock.

    Garbage men also spend a lot of time on the road(traffic deaths) and are constantly working around equipment that also won't notice, even a little bit, when they tear off a limb or crush a whole body.

    Don't be an ass, try thinking sometime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    Come on that’s a pretty easy one to figure out

    yeah, it is pretty easy to speculate. verifying that speculation is another story, and "funny" image comparing manipulated data to non-existent ones is not the best way to do it.

    Don’t be an ass, try thinking sometime.

    same to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Pilots are actually way more likely to die then you think. You're just thinking of commercial airlines. But the smaller planes go down a lot more often.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    small planes go down often. that is because these are hobby pilots who don't have enough training, practice, and oversight. but we are talking about JOBS here and professional pilots are one of the best trained, constantly retrained and scrutinized groups in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)

    There are a ton of JOBS involving those little tiny planes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    yes, ton of jobs involve small plane. but when there is an accident of small plane, it is usually the hobby pilot for the reasons stated.

    sure, there are some bush pilots in america, but the data in that usa today article make no sense. they compare some deaths to a sample of 37k pilots. there are about 300k holders of cpl or atpl in usa. i don't trust that article at all, it is tabloid bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I have no idea what USA Today article you're talking about. Or why you continue to just spout nonsense. There's tons of crashes involving things from tours to surveys to crop dusting to flight instructors, that's way more common you might think, even small transport. Pilot death is very high compared to other jobs. This is an incontrovertible fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    I have no idea what USA Today article you’re talking about.

    i am talking about the article that was linked in this thread as the source of the data.

    This is an incontrovertible fact.

    of course it is, darling. hey, there is johny and jimmy, both are pilots and jimmy died last year. the mortality among pilots skyrocketed into 50%!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    I don't see any article linked by op and I don't see any article linked by you so I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. If you're having a conversation with a different individual who linked an article then talk about it with them. If you want to talk about with me then you should link it yourself.

    The second half your comment is so brain dead I'm not even going to dignify it with a response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    If you want to talk (...) with me

    this one is easy. i don't. you started talking to me. and i don't feel it was very useful.

    The second half your comment is so brain dead I’m not even going to dignify it with a response.

    don't worry you don't get it. stay in school and maybe one day...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments