you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is Twilight really such a bad book? I read the first book when I was 12. I can't remember it being exceptionally bad – but again, I was 12...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, that's an extremely hot take. 90% of everything is garbage and books are no exception. I don't understand this mystification of books. As if shit becomes better when you take the effort of printing and binding it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I'm quite certain it's a carry-over from the 'middle' ages. Before the printing press, books would take an extreme amount of resources to create. You had to get the leather from a calf or ten twenty+ (IIRC one calf has enough skin for two pages), which would be bought from multiple villages within a lords domain (understand that cows were incredibly valuable back then for their milk and meat). Then you had to prepare it; the reason calves were used was because their skin would be relatively undamaged from bug bites (which would became holes during preparation) and would have somewhat less hair on it. Then you would have to have a scribe actually write in it and have it "illuminated" by other craftsmen (making it look pretty by applying gold leaf to the cover and/or the first letters of the chapter). This would all take years of labour as well.

    By the end, a finished, illuminated book would likely cost more than the entire building it's stored in, hence the chained libraries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The Giver is on this list?? It’s the only book I’ve wiling read three times!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments