Someone I live with insists on calling me "bro" and "dude", despite my repeated pleas for cessation, citing ideolect as a defence.

I get that "bro" and "dude" are part of their vocabulary, but it hurts. Am I in the wrong here?

P.S. Is this the right community for this kind of question?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, your friend is in the wrong. I use dude and bro a lot, and for everyone. I use it irregardless of gender. HOWEVER, I also respect others. If someone is uncomfortable with how I am referring to them, I accommodate. Because it costs me nearly nothing to change the way I talk, and I likely would be having a harmful impact on whoever I am talking with if I don't respect their boundaries. This is particularly the case for trans folk, cause refusing to accommodate only worsens the impact of gender dysphoria.

The only time I have ever given pushback is when someone tells me not to use the word "queer." I am queer, and I identify as gender-queer, and I will not censor my identity.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Someone told you not to use "queer"‽ That's absurd. It's been reclaimed now.

    That reminds me: this person also thinks Billy Joe Armstrong (who is bi) should be cancelled for saying the f-slur. Like, what‽

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I mean despite it being reclaimed, I still feel like theres a noticable caution around it. Like it is almost never used by anyone outside the queer community and mostly used by younger queers, and generally LGBT (and its variants) is more commonly used. To me that signals that queer's history still lingers, and I think thats particularly the case for older queer folk who had to deal with it as a slur for longer.

    To be fair though, this is all anecdotal

  • source
  • parent