Just blocked lemmy.ml from my Lemmy account, and I swear to god it's one of the best things I've ever done on this platform. My homepage feels actually clean now.

For the past few months I'd been seeing a lot of tankie posting and pretty much far-left propaganda on my feed. It got tiring enough that I finally checked my blocked-user list, and realized pretty much everyone I'd blocked was from lemmy.ml. So I just blocked the whole instance instead.

Saying this as someone who considers themselves a leftist: I used to think Lemmy itself was an echo chamber. Turns out lemmy.ml was the problem the entire time. Probably the reason I tolerated it for so long is that I agreed with a lot of what they posted, but like an oversaturated meme, I'd had enough. Browsing the platform was starting to feel way too tiring instead of fun, which defeats the point of being here in the first place.

The breaking point was seeing some dude post a "meme" implying North Korea and China are basically communist utopias and that the West sucks. I mean, the West does suck, but come on - you're saying North Korea is the ideal the West should strive for? What the hell...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 28 points 3 months ago (30 children)

Could someone give some examples of these leftist propaganda posts? I just browse all top day, maybe they get diluted enough for me to overlook these.. i've seen this argument pass by so many times.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [โ€“] 12 points 3 months ago (20 children)

    Try commenting that maybe, just maybe, Stalin wasn't the greatest benefactor of humanity, ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Trotsky would have been no better than Stalin.

    Then watch the fireworks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] -1 points 3 months ago

    I think it's a pretty common take that Trotsky's idea of Permanent Revolution would have been suicidal for the fledgling socialist state, so yea, I think running the Soviet Union directly into a broader, protracted war and losing the entire Soviet Union would have been worse than Stalin.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 months ago*

    YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND HE HAD TO MURDER MILLIONS SO THAT 10s OF MILLIONS COULD BE MISERABLE AND LIVE IN A CORRUPT OLIGARCHY REGIME, WHERE THE QUALITY OF LIFE WAS DECADES BEHIND THE WEST.

    and don't forget how glorious and prefect and FREE life is in China and North Korea.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] -1 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Want to really piss people off?

    "Over the last 50 years, regulated market economies have produced more wealth, pulled more people out of poverty, and resulted in less war than any other economic system in any period of history."

    In other words, the status quo of the last 50 years that everyone blames everything on, was in fact an exceptionally GOOD period of human history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 3 months ago

    The biggest problem is that this heavily relies on calling a socialist market economy like China a "regulated market economy," it's deceptive and implies capitalist countries have been pulling people out of poverty. In reality, China has pulled massively ahead with its socialist system, while capitalist countries have stagnated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] -1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    What's so hard about that? You are jumping to conclusions because my account is registered on lemmy.ml because at the time it seemed like a good place to start.

    Stalin wasn't the greatest benefactor.

    Now you say it about Trump, Netanyahu and Putin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [โ€“] 11 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Just to make you happy: Xi, Putin, Trump and Netanyahu should all be tried at the ICC in The Hague.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [โ€“] -3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Trump and Putin, sure, but naming Xi before any living former US president?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Are you really whining about list order? XD

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 months ago

    It is how they are taught/programed, when one false argument fails they move down to the level. Depending how good they are, destroy 2-3 levels of false shit and they end up just name calling.

    Just look at this thread all the .ml accounts are name calling at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I got banned from memes in Lemmy.ml over whether genocide in China is real. All the supporting evidence provided to me was from the Chinese government.

    Not saying US propaganda is trustworthy either blindly believing propaganda from any government is wild.

    I was also told that no one died at Tienanmen Square in that same thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    I checked the thread you were talking about, that's not what happened. The supporting evidence came from a huge number of different sources, including many western sources. You also equated Chinese diaspora with the Chinese government itself, which reeks of chauvanism.

    As for the bit on Tian'anmen Square, it's correct, even Wikipedia says so:

    Deaths in and around Tian'anmen Square itself

    Government officials have long asserted that no one died in the square in the early morning hours of 4 June, during the "hold-out" of students' last batch in the south part of the square. Initially, foreign media reports of a "massacre" on the square were prevalent, though subsequently, journalists have acknowledged that most of the deaths occurred outside of the square in western Beijing. Several people who were situated around the square that night, including former Beijing bureau chief of The Washington Post Jay Mathews[i] and CBS correspondent Richard Roth[j] reported that while they had heard sporadic gunfire, they could not find enough evidence to suggest that a massacre took place on the square.

    Student leader Chai Ling claimed in a speech broadcast on Hong Kong television that she witnessed tanks arrive at the square and crush students who were sleeping in their tents, and added that between 200 and 400 students died at the square.[268] Ling was joined by fellow student leader Wu'er Kaixi who said he had witnessed 200 students being cut down by gunfire; however, according to Mathews, it was later proven that he had already left the square several hours before the events he claimed to have happened.[211] Taiwan-born Hou Dejian was present in the square to show solidarity with the students and said that he did not see any massacre occurring in the square. He was quoted by Xiaoping Li, a former China dissident to have stated: "Some people said 200 died in the square, and others claimed that as many as 2,000 died. There were also stories of tanks running over students who were trying to leave. I have to say I did not see any of that. I was in the square until 6:30 in the morning."[269]

    In 2009, human rights activist Robin Munro, stated that he was present during the clearance of Tiananmen Square and that, according to his account, there were ten Western reporters near the Monument to the People's Heroes at the time. He also reported a Spanish television crew that recorded footage of the event. Munro disputed Wu'er Kaixi's claims of mass killings inside the square, stating that he did not witness fighting there and instead observed students peacefully complying with the soldiers' demands to leave the square in an orderly manner. He further noted that the Spanish TV crew reported not seeing killings within the square during the final clearance.[270][271]

    In 2011, three secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing from the time of the events were leaked and published by WikiLeaks, all of which stated that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square itself.[194] Instead, they said Chinese soldiers opened fire on protesters in Beijing outside the square, around Muxidi station, as they fought their way from the west towards the centre.[194] A Chilean diplomat who had been positioned next to a Red Cross station inside the square told his US counterparts that he did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds in the square itself, although sporadic gunfire was heard. He said that most of the troops who entered the square were armed only with anti-riot gear.[194][216]

    The square was evacuated bloodlessly, all of the deaths that day occurred in areas scattered around Beijing during riot suppression. A few hundred people died, which is a tragedy, but not 10,000 people being executed on the square like the west initially reported. Substantial evidence to the contrary since then has come out, and Wikipedia has accordingly responded and added this context.

    I don't think Wikipedia is a CPC front group.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Peak party truth is arguing akshully against a massacre occurring because it 'really happened a few meters outside of the square'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 months ago

    The killings weren't "a few meters outside the square." Riots happened in disparate places all over Beijing, with PLA members lynched. The PLA responded with force, and in the end a few hundred rioters and a few dozen PLA members were killed. The west reported on an entirely fabricated story of the PLA running their tanks over 10,000 students on Tian'anmen Square itself, which has remained in pop culture as the understanding of the events. It isn't about trying to play semantics, but to highlight that the west quite literally invented an entirely different history and reported on it as fact against a geopolitical enemy, one of many such examples.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 6 points 3 months ago

    If you criticism the Chinese government on a .ml instance, you will quickly get banned for "rule 2: xenophobia".

    Go to basically any comment section of a politics-related popular post on a .ml instance. I can almost guarantee that there will be some china/Russia/north Korea brainless take.

  • source
  • parent