43
ANY way to play just A version of fortnite? (lemdro.id)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

is there like ANY version of fortnite where you can play with windows users? if not what are the best alternatives?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 3 months ago* (31 children)

Afaik Fortnite blocks access to Linux users due to anticheat? Options that come to mind are running on a VM with Windows, playing on consoles, and playing on a burner computer with Windows installed on bare metal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 8 points 3 months ago (27 children)

    ive tried something like winboat and it was laggy as shit, i dont really have any modern console that plays fortnite other than the switch (yuck), and i dont think i have a spare Windows machine that isnt the slowet crap on earth

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago* (24 children)

    I'd just get a cheap small second hard drive for your PC, install windows on it, dual boot set up (keep linux as the primary drive and Grub will have Windows as an option) and use it to play Fortnite. Windows will pester about activating but if you're just using it to play Fortnite so ignore it.

    I Linux main, but kept my old Windows drive and install in case I ever need it. Haven't used it in ages, but it's pretty harmless to have an old drive sitting in my PC. I don't even mount the drive in Linux, it's just there if I need it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (14 children)

    Remember when we could get cheap second drives? Those were the days.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    a 500gb hard drive is like $30 thats nothing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I don't think anyone should be running an OS on a hard drive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Its slightly slower to first load and you're only using it to play one game which loads into ram anyway. There is no reason not to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (8 children)

    I think it's been quite awhile since you've used an OS on spinning rust. It's not a great time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    I have a PC in my house where the SSD has linux and windows is on the harddrive. It only boots for league of legends and its fine.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I'm sure it has no problem running the game from Windows XP days.

    The OS, unlike the game, is constantly running. It's not a slight difference.

    A person running in this configuration can often look forward to stuttering, which makes for a wonderful time.

    You're hilariously making out a configuration from a lifetime ago to work nearly as well.

    Fortnite and an OS on a hard drive is going to be a very bad time.

    What a strange thing to be contrarian aboot. It's almost like you're defending storage prices.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    They are speaking from personal experience. Why are you forcing an agenda on them. Have you tried running Fortnite + Windows from a hard drive? Because it sounds like they did something that was pretty close

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    What agenda am I pushing?

    I've been through most stages of computing. I remember being a wee lad with 5.25" floppies.

    There isn't much I haven't experienced.

    What they did was not close. Not even similar. They're playing a game from 2009 on a HDD. It doesn't require much.

    Storage is expensive. Wasting money on equipment that will leave you disappointed isn't what most would want.

    Spinning rust is fine for most games on a second drive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It's almost like you're defending storage prices.

    Here is where you are pushing an agenda on them. They aren't defending storage prices they are sharing their personal experience with a solution they offered to OP

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    If you really cannot live with a 500gb HDD for $30 you can a 500gb SSD for $60 which is still cheap. 2nd hand they're practically free.

    Also its not just league of legends, it also plays Rainbow six siege its really not as bad as you are making it out to be.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    hehe, true. I'd just buy a used one off ebay. It doesn't have to be a good drive really as it's not going to have critical data on it. People don't want them because the drives are old and could fail, but for this would literally just be windows and an online game so I'd take the risk of the inconvenience of having to replace it in a year. Any data lost can just be re-downloaded onto a new drive. E.g. I found a bunch of second hand SSDs for £30-£40 on a quick search now. Wouldn't touch them for data storage but for this - why not?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Using grub is a poor idea since Windows boot manager has a habit of breaking things if you do, the only way to avoid windows bricking your bootloader is to put windows on a separate drive and change the boot order in uefi

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)

    Good idea. And if @goofsqueak@lemdro.id goes for it and is concerned about the physical drive with Windows potentially tempering with the Linux install or reporting back to MS or whomever else whatever it finds, goofsqueak could unplug the Linux drive before plugging the Windows one, so no physical access to the main system is given to Windows.

    And to goofsqueak, any problem with Fortnite on the Switch? I don't play games as services so I wouldn't know, and at least from my experience with offline games, if the problem are graphics, Fortnite from the little I know of, I don't think would lose much in terms of quality.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    answer to the bottom question: the switches graphics sucks bum, yes, but the performance is also garbage. and paired with the joycons (i dont have a pro controller but can easily fix that) makes the experince horrible. i dont really remember how bad the performance was but i know it was bad. like imagine fortnite but compressed to shit, basically that

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Windows cant read ext4 or btrfs so I doubt they care enough to be sneakily trying to identify and read data on another partion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    When everything's data that could be harvested for who knows what nefarious reasons, I'd rather not risk their "can't read" to be actually "pretend not to be able to", specially coming from Microsoft.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Its not all nefarious. The bad is usually a byproduct of normal business usecase. Here there is little reason to hide ext4 and btrfs support just to spy on a few linux boxes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I hate this coopting of bare metal. Bare metal means no OS. Having an os is not bare metal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •