you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 3 months ago (32 children)

And how is he able to do that?

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (22 children)

    First off, the headline on this post does not match the current one on the article.. The current headline on the article is:

    Mayor Mamdani Unveils 30% Discount — Including All Produce, All Meat and Key Pantry Staples — at New Municipal Grocery Stores

    So the discount is not on everything. It's basically on healthy foods and staples. I would assume that the margins on the rest of the items will be set to cover the costs of the discounted ones. Also, a store like this is not supposed to be a profit center.

    It's supposed to make healthy foods available to people who struggle to afford it. If the store breaks even after rent, utilities, and payroll, then I would call it a glorious success.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 3 months ago (21 children)

    That didn't answer my question?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    The 'extra' money comes from jacking up the prices in other items in the same store, like candy and sodas. And from not spending as much money on other stuff like marketing and bonuses.

    There are two sides to the profit equation: expenses and revenue.

    In order for a store to make more profit, they can either increase their revenue (by raising prices, for example), or they can decrease their expenses (by laying people off, buying from cheaper suppliers, or paying executives less, for example).

    So these stores are lowering prices on some items. And making it up by some combination of RAISING prices on other items, and LOWERING their costs in other areas like marketing, executive bonuses, etc.

    Hope that helps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (19 children)

    Then rephrase your question, please. What exactly are you asking? Are you suggesting he doesn't have the authority to set the prices at these stores?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 months ago (18 children)

    I'm asking where the money is coming from to support these subsidies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    leaving aside the answers other people have given, if NYC can afford a world class private military with a ~$10B USD budget, they can afford to cover a minor deficit in food budget. It's like food stamps but cuts out a layer of bureaucracy and thus lower cost.

    This is what taxes should actually be funding.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (16 children)

    I see no reason to assume there is a subsidy involved. Grocery stores make money. The initial outlay to build and stock the stores is going to come from city taxes, I assume. But the discounts, as my prior post said, are only on some items. The revenue from the higher margin, non-discounted items can cover the costs of the discounted ones assuming they price things right. The store only needs to break even to be a resounding success.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    The money has to come from somewhere. These groceries don't just magic themselves onto the shelves...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    You understand the groceries still cost something right? Your acting like their giving them away for free. A public option doesn't have to support billions in profit for the CEO, executives, and investors, so reducing price is much much easier if your only goal is to break even. The goal is no cost to the taxpayer, no profit for the city.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    You understand the groceries still cost something right? Your acting like their giving them away for free.

    Did you reply to the wrong person? That's the exact opposite of what I'm doing.

    A public option doesn't have to support billions in profit for the CEO

    How is this supposed to explain where the money is coming from? No one is talking about billions, I'm asking where did the 30% extra money come from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    If a loaf of bread costs $5 at a for profit grocery store that had inflated executive salaries and profit for investors to worry about, that same loaf of bread costs less at a store that doesn't need to show a huge profit. They can sell it at 3.50 and break even. Its not money "coming" from somewhere, its just product being sold at cost, instead of for profit.

    If I had to wager a guess, this 30% off is just marketing. They probably realized their cost outlay is lower than they anticipated and they are passing those savings on to the consumer. Turns out cutting out greed saves consumers money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Sure, but we're not talking about for-profit and not-for-profit. We're talking about the same store.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Your reading comprehension through all of this has been abysmal, possible explanations have been given by me and others and you are still sea-lioning.

    They probably realized their cost outlay is lower than they anticipated and they are passing those savings on to the consumer.

    Others have suggested they are absorbing those discounts in non essential items.

    You can disagree with these explanations, but you instead keep sidestepping them and choosing to pretend your question wasn't answered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Asking a question is not sealioning. I don't even think you know what that word means. No one has answered the question. Yourself included.

    You provided a flawed explanation, which I then explained to you. Instead of providing some sort of counterargument, you then go on the offensive and blame me for it. It seems like you're just offended that anyone wouldn't just accept what you say and not ask questions.

    They probably realized their cost outlay is lower than they anticipated and they are passing those savings on to the consumer.

    This is not an explanation, this is speculation, as denoted by the word "probably".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Congrats on actually addressing an answer. I have hope for you. Maybe go back to the person you claimed never answered you, with your response to them as well.

    Any answer any of us give is going to be speculation, we don't have their financials in front of us. If you want more than speculation your best option is to research the topic yourself or go to New York and foia request the grocery store financials. No one on Lemmy is going to do that for you just because you asked a question. People are going to respond what they think while they take a shit and go about their day.

    This is not an explanation, this is speculation, as denoted by the word "probably".

    A speculative explanation is still an explanation. We are not obligated to give an academic response to a half asses question to a person too mentally lazy to research their own question. If this is so important to you, that you will attempt to annoy dozens of commenters and readers on the internet, you could have used that time to try to answer that question yourself if you need a thorough accounting of their financial outlay. No one here will do that for you just because you are, "just asking questions".

    You can try to annoy me all you want though, I enjoy responding to people looking for pointless arguments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Any answer any of us give is going to be speculation

    Actually not correct at all. Someone did come and actually provide a factual answer. You could learn something from them.

    No one on Lemmy is going to do that for you just because you asked a question.

    They did though. Because that's precisely what forums like this are for.

    A speculative explanation is still an explanation.

    Wrong again.

    We are not obligated to give an academic response

    You're not obligated to give me anything. And yet here you are, making up answers that don't even answer the question I asked. If you don't have an answer, just keep scrolling.

    I enjoy responding to people looking for pointless arguments.

    Sorry to disappoint. Will have to look elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Based on the posts in this thread you are either sealioning, or are just dense.

    If the goal of the store is not to make a profit (and either break even, or have some tax dollars allocated to it), the prices go down.

    Where are all your posts asking for where the NYPD’s cosplay warrior gear comes from? That certainly doesn’t magic itself into existence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Believe it or not, everyone you disagree with is not "just dense". You obviously have no interest in engaging in a good faith discussion since you immediately came in here and began slinging insults so you're being blocked, goodbye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    In all fairness, you had your question answered very clearly, twice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Sort of. Where specifically are the subsidies being pulled from? Even if you neglect profit, you have operating costs before you break even. Asking these types of questions is not criticism or direct opposition to the concept

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Likely the same reason "Chinese groceries" are so cheap...

    The absolute vast majority of Americans get their food from the same handful of corporations that all have insanely high markups at every step of their vertical integration to obfuscate profits.

    The "Chinese groceries" have built up their own infrastructure that buys from small farmers all over the nation and transporta fresh produce more effectively than corporations. Because corporations just prioritize shelf stability and looks over flavor and nutrition.

    Now, to be fair this is also true to a lesser extent for Hispanic and other "ethnic groceries" as well, but more often than not they're plugged into the Chinese infrastructure as well, especially for produce that isn't in season locally. It's really the only option a small restaurant has to make it these days.

    Which means they're the safest to eat at during widespread outbreaks like were seeing now. Because all the chains use the same giant suppliers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] -18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thanks for confirming you don't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments