you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

See what I mean?

As if a proxy blindly passing traffic directly to a backend server "reduces attack surface" in any meaningful way. ๐Ÿ™„

Edit: Guy edits his post with a bunch of stuff and assumes I've read it later. I can't eyeroll enough...

  1. You've increased your "attack surface" by adding a second application to the stack. Proxies aren't magic, they are also targets.
  2. Sure - you can do those things on a proxy. How many people here are? And why are those things never suggested when people here say "use a reverse proxy"? Because they think the proxy is the security.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Did you just add 'blindly passing traffic' to your statement? Did you read my comment about can help?

    Move on, joker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    Sorry - which part of your comment added anything of value? "can help to minimize the attack surface"? 99% of the time a proxy just passes traffic through. Unless you're talking about a WAF which is a) a different thing and b) NOT what any home gamers are talking about when they recommend nginx, traefik, etc. to newbs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments