I got a place on the 512GB with Controller list, and got an email a few days after they started. I ordered it on Friday the 3rd and got it today on Thursday the 9th. The tracking codes were all over the place and gave different estimates depending which branch of each company I used. Steam claimed it was shipped when the courier said they hadn't got it so I was worried for a few days. But this morning Royal Mail (UK customer) sent me an email saying it would arrive today, while GLS said it would arrive tomorrow.

Safe to say I'm happy to have it now and be playing games!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 128 points 4 months ago* (10 children)

I will not call it overpriced because the current PC market is crazy because of AI. Even Valve isn't happy with the price.

Overpriced would mean that Valve would be making a significant profit. They will not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah, the fact that they are using bespoke parts, but still barely come in above the independent build cost tells me that they aren't raking billions off of this. I'm fine with the price. Expensive, yes, but so is everything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It is 'overpriced' compared to a desktop in the same way laptops are 'overpriced' compared to desktops. Making things smaller increases cost, especially when there is a lot of heat dissipation needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Is this 'overprice compared to laptop" reflection still valid with the current AI driven price peak of separate components?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Yes because the desktop equivalent cost machine would be faster, no cpu locked at 30w or cut down gpu. Just like with a laptop.

    It is expensive for a pretty low end machine but also so is everything now. And it does look nice and comes with a more console like experience out the box.

    No one should be buying this thing based on performance alone, but it still ticks many other boxes

  • source
  • parent
  • Something can be overpriced and the company can still be losing money on it. How much profit the company making it makes is entirely irrelevant to the usability for the end consumer.

    If they made a bunch of poor choices that made the cost of the product go up that doesn’t change the fact that I could’ve gotten more for my money from a better designed product. Like they could make the entire chassis a solid copper cube and that could cost say $1000 alone. And it could cool like shit. If they did then this $2k copper steam machine would be extremely overpriced.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I want to see what Sony and Microsoft price theirs at and how much of a loss it will be for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Sony can afford to discount on the promise of online sales and planned cost reduction. I'm not sure Microsoft are going to manage another Xbox.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Well... no.

    Thats... Sony and MSFT raised prices on all of their hardware too, same with Nintendo.

    We're at the point where being a huge player... can only get you priority in the queue for chips and parts.

    It can no longer secure bulk pricing discounts.

    That's how bad this is.

  • source
  • parent