▲ 424 ▼ China is building 75 solar parks in Cuba, and the island’s power crisis is becoming an infrastructure experiment (www.vozpopuli.com) submitted 4 months ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/energy@slrpnk.net 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] kibblebits -23 points 4 months ago (35 children) Why not before? Optics.. permalink fedilink source hideshow 35 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago Because before Cuba got tons of oil from Venezuela. The US ended that with no plan on how Cuba would cope, just left them to fucking die. It's gross. Cuba had it's entire infrastructure built around oil burning to produce power. permalink fedilink source parent [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 28 points 4 months ago (19 children) Yes, optics, because if the US sinks ships carrying solar panels they lose even more respect on the international stage and bring even more attention to their illegal military blockade of Cuba in which they have directly killed over 200 civilians via bombing vessels in and around Cuba, and indirectly killed at least a few thousand by eliminating oil imports to the country. China had nothing but risk before the carrier group was moved into place, as the US' official stance was international sanctions and complete lockout from using USD internationally if you dared to trade with Cuba. After the blockade those sanctions are meaningless as no other country would follow the US if they actually issue said sanctions, and the US itself isn't economically capable of handling sanctions against China at this point in time. So China has no risk to help out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 13 points 4 months ago (14 children) So China has no risk to help out If China saw it that way, they would be sending oil. They're still trying not to rock the boat, the way I had it explained by a chinese cab driver is that if they continue to follow the rules and be reliable, more of the world will be willing to expand relations with China, protecting them from the US or anybody else acting unfairly. I did not call him naive to his face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (8 children) Why do you think aiding an addiction would be helping out? Solar panels are blockade proof. Cuba's biggest problems come from over reliance on disposable imports; if Cuba had access to solar Venezuela wouldn't have been invaded and Cuba wouldn't have any real negative effects from this blockade besides the loss of tourism income. Besides China doesn't sell oil, they do sell Solar panels and batteries. One generally gives what they have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (5 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don't die is not feeding an addiction wtf. China has tankers with oil, this is an emergency, building solar is great long term, but it doesn't matter to the patients on ventilators and the farmers who's tractors have no fuel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (4 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don’t die is not feeding an addiction wtf. What... what do you think the solar panels are going to do? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) They will decrease the severity of the crisis, but as the article says, theres not enough, they take time to come online, and upgrading Cuba's grid and storage will take even longer, and it still doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. Cuba needs oil now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago Take far longer to set up that it would to simply make use of the existing infrastructure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) Cuba has a huge capacity to make ethanol. Brazil does this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Brazil is around 8,514,877 km², Cuba is around 110,860 km². Brazil has around 963,000 km² farm land. Cuba has around 36,000 km²[1] of farmland. If it were to convert all of its farmland into ethanol production, resulting in the mass starvation of the Cuban population, it could not produce anything close to what Brazil could produce. But how much could it produce? We'll be assuming Brazil's sugarcane method is the most efficient crop for Cuba given their similar climates and growing zones. Which gives us around 764,000 liters of ethanol per km² Cuba uses 178,000 barrels per day of oil, which comes out to 28,302,000 liters of oil per day, or around 10,337,305,500 liters per year. Which means Cuba only needs to convert... 13,560 km² of their farmland to ethanol production. So the famously fat and never food insecure Cubans need to just give up half[1] of their food production! Great solution. [1]Cuba has 109,000 km² of land, and many sources give the available farmland of cuba at 30% of available land... but also list it at 65.000 km². Which wouldn't be 30%. I'm assuming 30% is about right given the geography of Cuba. It's possible 63% of Cuba is farmland, which makes this slightly easier, but looking at google maps that doesn't seem right. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The US still has an oil embargo in place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago US has been embargoing Cuba since the 60s. permalink fedilink source parent [–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago if they continue to follow the rules and be reliable, more of the world will be willing to expand relations with China, protecting them from the US or anybody else acting unfairly I feel that this is true to an extent. If you are a government in Africa or a company in Singapore, will you prefer to do business with the guys who have a track record of keeping their word, or the guy who changes his mind every second day? Besides, if China openly flouts the blockade, how sure are you that Trump won't start WW3? Better to just deny any new weapons and wait for the old ones to rust. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) If China saw it that way, they would be sending oil. Short term solution from a country without oil. I did not call him naive to his face. How dare China behave like the USA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago The naive part was expecting China to be treated fairly by America or its vassals, any progress will be undone via propaganda. Look at this very thread, how many comments are seeing China fighting climate change, protecting Cuba's sovereignty, and stopping a literal famine, and trying to explain why actually "China bad". permalink fedilink source parent [+] kibblebits -12 points 4 months ago (3 children) Nice alt account permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) Girl my account is older than yours permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I think she thinks we're the same person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago wait is it solipsism saturday sunday again? fuck it's not my turn to exist. whosever it is, could you imagine me having a pony named Buckshit that likes apples? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 40 points 4 months ago* (5 children) Because before Cuban doctors didn't have to rush to manually pump the respirators for intubated infants multiple times a week during blackouts due to the US blockade intensifying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] kibblebits -26 points 4 months ago (4 children) Your user tag is “Wumao” so I’m gonna trust my gut. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 26 points 4 months ago (3 children) I'm literally American lol. But I was in China a couple months ago, so I understand why you wouldn't want to listen to anyone with direct knowledge of the subject, we wouldn't want to challenge pre-existing beliefs with evidence and observation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca -3 points 4 months ago (2 children) If Russia can pay Americans to spout propaganda benefitting Russia, why can't China do the same? I'm not saying you are, but "I'm literally American" isn't a useful response by any means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Except you could also be someone's influence campaign. If you automatically give the assumption of "paid propagandist" more weight than the assumption of earnest belief, you may as well exit the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 4 months ago I'm specifically saying "I'm an American" isn't a useful rebuttal about being a paid propagandist, nothing more or less. I didn't say if it was my belief that he was. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 4 months ago (2 children) Literally every good thing countries do that they don't have to is either completely or partially optics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] taiyang@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago Yes, which we call soft power. It's generally very beneficial, which is exactly why US gutted USAID because they literally can't do anything right. Few million in infrastructure aid pays out huge with soft power. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago politics is the business of optics, so while you're not wrong it doesn't feel like a useful comparison. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children) Maybe, but helping a people with similar politics who are suffering miserably is always a good thing for those people. The fact that they are so close to a mutual enemy is icing on the cake. This is the culture that gave us "the Art of War", after all. I'd expect no less of them, and normally I'd expect at least as much from us. Unfortunately we're lead by the (possibly) worst representative of humanity possible right now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kibblebits 2 points 4 months ago (3 children) They dont have similar politics, lmfao. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) No, they are not both communist nations with a similar dislike of America and authoritarian governments. One loves America and hates Communism. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kibblebits 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) I see no communism in China. Cuba, maybe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Sigh. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago Because before Cuba got tons of oil from Venezuela. The US ended that with no plan on how Cuba would cope, just left them to fucking die. It's gross. Cuba had it's entire infrastructure built around oil burning to produce power. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 28 points 4 months ago (19 children) Yes, optics, because if the US sinks ships carrying solar panels they lose even more respect on the international stage and bring even more attention to their illegal military blockade of Cuba in which they have directly killed over 200 civilians via bombing vessels in and around Cuba, and indirectly killed at least a few thousand by eliminating oil imports to the country. China had nothing but risk before the carrier group was moved into place, as the US' official stance was international sanctions and complete lockout from using USD internationally if you dared to trade with Cuba. After the blockade those sanctions are meaningless as no other country would follow the US if they actually issue said sanctions, and the US itself isn't economically capable of handling sanctions against China at this point in time. So China has no risk to help out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 13 points 4 months ago (14 children) So China has no risk to help out If China saw it that way, they would be sending oil. They're still trying not to rock the boat, the way I had it explained by a chinese cab driver is that if they continue to follow the rules and be reliable, more of the world will be willing to expand relations with China, protecting them from the US or anybody else acting unfairly. I did not call him naive to his face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (8 children) Why do you think aiding an addiction would be helping out? Solar panels are blockade proof. Cuba's biggest problems come from over reliance on disposable imports; if Cuba had access to solar Venezuela wouldn't have been invaded and Cuba wouldn't have any real negative effects from this blockade besides the loss of tourism income. Besides China doesn't sell oil, they do sell Solar panels and batteries. One generally gives what they have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (5 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don't die is not feeding an addiction wtf. China has tankers with oil, this is an emergency, building solar is great long term, but it doesn't matter to the patients on ventilators and the farmers who's tractors have no fuel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (4 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don’t die is not feeding an addiction wtf. What... what do you think the solar panels are going to do? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) They will decrease the severity of the crisis, but as the article says, theres not enough, they take time to come online, and upgrading Cuba's grid and storage will take even longer, and it still doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. Cuba needs oil now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago Take far longer to set up that it would to simply make use of the existing infrastructure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) Cuba has a huge capacity to make ethanol. Brazil does this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Brazil is around 8,514,877 km², Cuba is around 110,860 km². Brazil has around 963,000 km² farm land. Cuba has around 36,000 km²[1] of farmland. If it were to convert all of its farmland into ethanol production, resulting in the mass starvation of the Cuban population, it could not produce anything close to what Brazil could produce. But how much could it produce? We'll be assuming Brazil's sugarcane method is the most efficient crop for Cuba given their similar climates and growing zones. Which gives us around 764,000 liters of ethanol per km² Cuba uses 178,000 barrels per day of oil, which comes out to 28,302,000 liters of oil per day, or around 10,337,305,500 liters per year. Which means Cuba only needs to convert... 13,560 km² of their farmland to ethanol production. So the famously fat and never food insecure Cubans need to just give up half[1] of their food production! Great solution. [1]Cuba has 109,000 km² of land, and many sources give the available farmland of cuba at 30% of available land... but also list it at 65.000 km². Which wouldn't be 30%. I'm assuming 30% is about right given the geography of Cuba. It's possible 63% of Cuba is farmland, which makes this slightly easier, but looking at google maps that doesn't seem right. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The US still has an oil embargo in place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago US has been embargoing Cuba since the 60s. permalink fedilink source parent [–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago if they continue to follow the rules and be reliable, more of the world will be willing to expand relations with China, protecting them from the US or anybody else acting unfairly I feel that this is true to an extent. If you are a government in Africa or a company in Singapore, will you prefer to do business with the guys who have a track record of keeping their word, or the guy who changes his mind every second day? Besides, if China openly flouts the blockade, how sure are you that Trump won't start WW3? Better to just deny any new weapons and wait for the old ones to rust. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) If China saw it that way, they would be sending oil. Short term solution from a country without oil. I did not call him naive to his face. How dare China behave like the USA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago The naive part was expecting China to be treated fairly by America or its vassals, any progress will be undone via propaganda. Look at this very thread, how many comments are seeing China fighting climate change, protecting Cuba's sovereignty, and stopping a literal famine, and trying to explain why actually "China bad". permalink fedilink source parent [+] kibblebits -12 points 4 months ago (3 children) Nice alt account permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) Girl my account is older than yours permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I think she thinks we're the same person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago wait is it solipsism saturday sunday again? fuck it's not my turn to exist. whosever it is, could you imagine me having a pony named Buckshit that likes apples? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 13 points 4 months ago (14 children) So China has no risk to help out If China saw it that way, they would be sending oil. They're still trying not to rock the boat, the way I had it explained by a chinese cab driver is that if they continue to follow the rules and be reliable, more of the world will be willing to expand relations with China, protecting them from the US or anybody else acting unfairly. I did not call him naive to his face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (8 children) Why do you think aiding an addiction would be helping out? Solar panels are blockade proof. Cuba's biggest problems come from over reliance on disposable imports; if Cuba had access to solar Venezuela wouldn't have been invaded and Cuba wouldn't have any real negative effects from this blockade besides the loss of tourism income. Besides China doesn't sell oil, they do sell Solar panels and batteries. One generally gives what they have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (5 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don't die is not feeding an addiction wtf. China has tankers with oil, this is an emergency, building solar is great long term, but it doesn't matter to the patients on ventilators and the farmers who's tractors have no fuel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (4 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don’t die is not feeding an addiction wtf. What... what do you think the solar panels are going to do? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) They will decrease the severity of the crisis, but as the article says, theres not enough, they take time to come online, and upgrading Cuba's grid and storage will take even longer, and it still doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. Cuba needs oil now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago Take far longer to set up that it would to simply make use of the existing infrastructure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) Cuba has a huge capacity to make ethanol. Brazil does this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Brazil is around 8,514,877 km², Cuba is around 110,860 km². Brazil has around 963,000 km² farm land. Cuba has around 36,000 km²[1] of farmland. If it were to convert all of its farmland into ethanol production, resulting in the mass starvation of the Cuban population, it could not produce anything close to what Brazil could produce. But how much could it produce? We'll be assuming Brazil's sugarcane method is the most efficient crop for Cuba given their similar climates and growing zones. Which gives us around 764,000 liters of ethanol per km² Cuba uses 178,000 barrels per day of oil, which comes out to 28,302,000 liters of oil per day, or around 10,337,305,500 liters per year. Which means Cuba only needs to convert... 13,560 km² of their farmland to ethanol production. So the famously fat and never food insecure Cubans need to just give up half[1] of their food production! Great solution. [1]Cuba has 109,000 km² of land, and many sources give the available farmland of cuba at 30% of available land... but also list it at 65.000 km². Which wouldn't be 30%. I'm assuming 30% is about right given the geography of Cuba. It's possible 63% of Cuba is farmland, which makes this slightly easier, but looking at google maps that doesn't seem right. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The US still has an oil embargo in place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago US has been embargoing Cuba since the 60s. permalink fedilink source parent [–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago if they continue to follow the rules and be reliable, more of the world will be willing to expand relations with China, protecting them from the US or anybody else acting unfairly I feel that this is true to an extent. If you are a government in Africa or a company in Singapore, will you prefer to do business with the guys who have a track record of keeping their word, or the guy who changes his mind every second day? Besides, if China openly flouts the blockade, how sure are you that Trump won't start WW3? Better to just deny any new weapons and wait for the old ones to rust. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) If China saw it that way, they would be sending oil. Short term solution from a country without oil. I did not call him naive to his face. How dare China behave like the USA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago The naive part was expecting China to be treated fairly by America or its vassals, any progress will be undone via propaganda. Look at this very thread, how many comments are seeing China fighting climate change, protecting Cuba's sovereignty, and stopping a literal famine, and trying to explain why actually "China bad". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (8 children) Why do you think aiding an addiction would be helping out? Solar panels are blockade proof. Cuba's biggest problems come from over reliance on disposable imports; if Cuba had access to solar Venezuela wouldn't have been invaded and Cuba wouldn't have any real negative effects from this blockade besides the loss of tourism income. Besides China doesn't sell oil, they do sell Solar panels and batteries. One generally gives what they have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (5 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don't die is not feeding an addiction wtf. China has tankers with oil, this is an emergency, building solar is great long term, but it doesn't matter to the patients on ventilators and the farmers who's tractors have no fuel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (4 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don’t die is not feeding an addiction wtf. What... what do you think the solar panels are going to do? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) They will decrease the severity of the crisis, but as the article says, theres not enough, they take time to come online, and upgrading Cuba's grid and storage will take even longer, and it still doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. Cuba needs oil now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago Take far longer to set up that it would to simply make use of the existing infrastructure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) Cuba has a huge capacity to make ethanol. Brazil does this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Brazil is around 8,514,877 km², Cuba is around 110,860 km². Brazil has around 963,000 km² farm land. Cuba has around 36,000 km²[1] of farmland. If it were to convert all of its farmland into ethanol production, resulting in the mass starvation of the Cuban population, it could not produce anything close to what Brazil could produce. But how much could it produce? We'll be assuming Brazil's sugarcane method is the most efficient crop for Cuba given their similar climates and growing zones. Which gives us around 764,000 liters of ethanol per km² Cuba uses 178,000 barrels per day of oil, which comes out to 28,302,000 liters of oil per day, or around 10,337,305,500 liters per year. Which means Cuba only needs to convert... 13,560 km² of their farmland to ethanol production. So the famously fat and never food insecure Cubans need to just give up half[1] of their food production! Great solution. [1]Cuba has 109,000 km² of land, and many sources give the available farmland of cuba at 30% of available land... but also list it at 65.000 km². Which wouldn't be 30%. I'm assuming 30% is about right given the geography of Cuba. It's possible 63% of Cuba is farmland, which makes this slightly easier, but looking at google maps that doesn't seem right. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (5 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don't die is not feeding an addiction wtf. China has tankers with oil, this is an emergency, building solar is great long term, but it doesn't matter to the patients on ventilators and the farmers who's tractors have no fuel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (4 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don’t die is not feeding an addiction wtf. What... what do you think the solar panels are going to do? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) They will decrease the severity of the crisis, but as the article says, theres not enough, they take time to come online, and upgrading Cuba's grid and storage will take even longer, and it still doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. Cuba needs oil now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago Take far longer to set up that it would to simply make use of the existing infrastructure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago (4 children) Keeping the power plants running so babies don’t die is not feeding an addiction wtf. What... what do you think the solar panels are going to do? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) They will decrease the severity of the crisis, but as the article says, theres not enough, they take time to come online, and upgrading Cuba's grid and storage will take even longer, and it still doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. Cuba needs oil now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago Take far longer to set up that it would to simply make use of the existing infrastructure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) They will decrease the severity of the crisis, but as the article says, theres not enough, they take time to come online, and upgrading Cuba's grid and storage will take even longer, and it still doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. Cuba needs oil now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) doesn't help processes that need oil like farming and concrete production. If they can reduce oil use in power generation, it should help by reducing the overall amounts of oil they need to procure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago The argument here isn't that solar won't help in the future, it's that people are literally dying because they don't have oil right now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago Take far longer to set up that it would to simply make use of the existing infrastructure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) Cuba has a huge capacity to make ethanol. Brazil does this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Brazil is around 8,514,877 km², Cuba is around 110,860 km². Brazil has around 963,000 km² farm land. Cuba has around 36,000 km²[1] of farmland. If it were to convert all of its farmland into ethanol production, resulting in the mass starvation of the Cuban population, it could not produce anything close to what Brazil could produce. But how much could it produce? We'll be assuming Brazil's sugarcane method is the most efficient crop for Cuba given their similar climates and growing zones. Which gives us around 764,000 liters of ethanol per km² Cuba uses 178,000 barrels per day of oil, which comes out to 28,302,000 liters of oil per day, or around 10,337,305,500 liters per year. Which means Cuba only needs to convert... 13,560 km² of their farmland to ethanol production. So the famously fat and never food insecure Cubans need to just give up half[1] of their food production! Great solution. [1]Cuba has 109,000 km² of land, and many sources give the available farmland of cuba at 30% of available land... but also list it at 65.000 km². Which wouldn't be 30%. I'm assuming 30% is about right given the geography of Cuba. It's possible 63% of Cuba is farmland, which makes this slightly easier, but looking at google maps that doesn't seem right. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Brazil is around 8,514,877 km², Cuba is around 110,860 km². Brazil has around 963,000 km² farm land. Cuba has around 36,000 km²[1] of farmland. If it were to convert all of its farmland into ethanol production, resulting in the mass starvation of the Cuban population, it could not produce anything close to what Brazil could produce. But how much could it produce? We'll be assuming Brazil's sugarcane method is the most efficient crop for Cuba given their similar climates and growing zones. Which gives us around 764,000 liters of ethanol per km² Cuba uses 178,000 barrels per day of oil, which comes out to 28,302,000 liters of oil per day, or around 10,337,305,500 liters per year. Which means Cuba only needs to convert... 13,560 km² of their farmland to ethanol production. So the famously fat and never food insecure Cubans need to just give up half[1] of their food production! Great solution. [1]Cuba has 109,000 km² of land, and many sources give the available farmland of cuba at 30% of available land... but also list it at 65.000 km². Which wouldn't be 30%. I'm assuming 30% is about right given the geography of Cuba. It's possible 63% of Cuba is farmland, which makes this slightly easier, but looking at google maps that doesn't seem right. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) The US still has an oil embargo in place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago US has been embargoing Cuba since the 60s. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago US has been embargoing Cuba since the 60s. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago if they continue to follow the rules and be reliable, more of the world will be willing to expand relations with China, protecting them from the US or anybody else acting unfairly I feel that this is true to an extent. If you are a government in Africa or a company in Singapore, will you prefer to do business with the guys who have a track record of keeping their word, or the guy who changes his mind every second day? Besides, if China openly flouts the blockade, how sure are you that Trump won't start WW3? Better to just deny any new weapons and wait for the old ones to rust. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) If China saw it that way, they would be sending oil. Short term solution from a country without oil. I did not call him naive to his face. How dare China behave like the USA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago The naive part was expecting China to be treated fairly by America or its vassals, any progress will be undone via propaganda. Look at this very thread, how many comments are seeing China fighting climate change, protecting Cuba's sovereignty, and stopping a literal famine, and trying to explain why actually "China bad". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago The naive part was expecting China to be treated fairly by America or its vassals, any progress will be undone via propaganda. Look at this very thread, how many comments are seeing China fighting climate change, protecting Cuba's sovereignty, and stopping a literal famine, and trying to explain why actually "China bad". permalink fedilink source parent
[+] kibblebits -12 points 4 months ago (3 children) Nice alt account permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) Girl my account is older than yours permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I think she thinks we're the same person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago wait is it solipsism saturday sunday again? fuck it's not my turn to exist. whosever it is, could you imagine me having a pony named Buckshit that likes apples? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children) Girl my account is older than yours permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I think she thinks we're the same person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago wait is it solipsism saturday sunday again? fuck it's not my turn to exist. whosever it is, could you imagine me having a pony named Buckshit that likes apples? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I think she thinks we're the same person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago wait is it solipsism saturday sunday again? fuck it's not my turn to exist. whosever it is, could you imagine me having a pony named Buckshit that likes apples? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago wait is it solipsism saturday sunday again? fuck it's not my turn to exist. whosever it is, could you imagine me having a pony named Buckshit that likes apples? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 40 points 4 months ago* (5 children) Because before Cuban doctors didn't have to rush to manually pump the respirators for intubated infants multiple times a week during blackouts due to the US blockade intensifying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] kibblebits -26 points 4 months ago (4 children) Your user tag is “Wumao” so I’m gonna trust my gut. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 26 points 4 months ago (3 children) I'm literally American lol. But I was in China a couple months ago, so I understand why you wouldn't want to listen to anyone with direct knowledge of the subject, we wouldn't want to challenge pre-existing beliefs with evidence and observation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca -3 points 4 months ago (2 children) If Russia can pay Americans to spout propaganda benefitting Russia, why can't China do the same? I'm not saying you are, but "I'm literally American" isn't a useful response by any means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Except you could also be someone's influence campaign. If you automatically give the assumption of "paid propagandist" more weight than the assumption of earnest belief, you may as well exit the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 4 months ago I'm specifically saying "I'm an American" isn't a useful rebuttal about being a paid propagandist, nothing more or less. I didn't say if it was my belief that he was. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] kibblebits -26 points 4 months ago (4 children) Your user tag is “Wumao” so I’m gonna trust my gut. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 26 points 4 months ago (3 children) I'm literally American lol. But I was in China a couple months ago, so I understand why you wouldn't want to listen to anyone with direct knowledge of the subject, we wouldn't want to challenge pre-existing beliefs with evidence and observation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca -3 points 4 months ago (2 children) If Russia can pay Americans to spout propaganda benefitting Russia, why can't China do the same? I'm not saying you are, but "I'm literally American" isn't a useful response by any means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Except you could also be someone's influence campaign. If you automatically give the assumption of "paid propagandist" more weight than the assumption of earnest belief, you may as well exit the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 4 months ago I'm specifically saying "I'm an American" isn't a useful rebuttal about being a paid propagandist, nothing more or less. I didn't say if it was my belief that he was. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 26 points 4 months ago (3 children) I'm literally American lol. But I was in China a couple months ago, so I understand why you wouldn't want to listen to anyone with direct knowledge of the subject, we wouldn't want to challenge pre-existing beliefs with evidence and observation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca -3 points 4 months ago (2 children) If Russia can pay Americans to spout propaganda benefitting Russia, why can't China do the same? I'm not saying you are, but "I'm literally American" isn't a useful response by any means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Except you could also be someone's influence campaign. If you automatically give the assumption of "paid propagandist" more weight than the assumption of earnest belief, you may as well exit the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 4 months ago I'm specifically saying "I'm an American" isn't a useful rebuttal about being a paid propagandist, nothing more or less. I didn't say if it was my belief that he was. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca -3 points 4 months ago (2 children) If Russia can pay Americans to spout propaganda benefitting Russia, why can't China do the same? I'm not saying you are, but "I'm literally American" isn't a useful response by any means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Except you could also be someone's influence campaign. If you automatically give the assumption of "paid propagandist" more weight than the assumption of earnest belief, you may as well exit the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 4 months ago I'm specifically saying "I'm an American" isn't a useful rebuttal about being a paid propagandist, nothing more or less. I didn't say if it was my belief that he was. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child) Except you could also be someone's influence campaign. If you automatically give the assumption of "paid propagandist" more weight than the assumption of earnest belief, you may as well exit the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 4 months ago I'm specifically saying "I'm an American" isn't a useful rebuttal about being a paid propagandist, nothing more or less. I didn't say if it was my belief that he was. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 4 months ago I'm specifically saying "I'm an American" isn't a useful rebuttal about being a paid propagandist, nothing more or less. I didn't say if it was my belief that he was. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 4 months ago (2 children) Literally every good thing countries do that they don't have to is either completely or partially optics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] taiyang@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago Yes, which we call soft power. It's generally very beneficial, which is exactly why US gutted USAID because they literally can't do anything right. Few million in infrastructure aid pays out huge with soft power. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago politics is the business of optics, so while you're not wrong it doesn't feel like a useful comparison. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago Yes, which we call soft power. It's generally very beneficial, which is exactly why US gutted USAID because they literally can't do anything right. Few million in infrastructure aid pays out huge with soft power. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago politics is the business of optics, so while you're not wrong it doesn't feel like a useful comparison. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children) Maybe, but helping a people with similar politics who are suffering miserably is always a good thing for those people. The fact that they are so close to a mutual enemy is icing on the cake. This is the culture that gave us "the Art of War", after all. I'd expect no less of them, and normally I'd expect at least as much from us. Unfortunately we're lead by the (possibly) worst representative of humanity possible right now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kibblebits 2 points 4 months ago (3 children) They dont have similar politics, lmfao. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) No, they are not both communist nations with a similar dislike of America and authoritarian governments. One loves America and hates Communism. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kibblebits 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) I see no communism in China. Cuba, maybe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Sigh. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kibblebits 2 points 4 months ago (3 children) They dont have similar politics, lmfao. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) No, they are not both communist nations with a similar dislike of America and authoritarian governments. One loves America and hates Communism. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kibblebits 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) I see no communism in China. Cuba, maybe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Sigh. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (2 children) No, they are not both communist nations with a similar dislike of America and authoritarian governments. One loves America and hates Communism. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kibblebits 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) I see no communism in China. Cuba, maybe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Sigh. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kibblebits 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) I see no communism in China. Cuba, maybe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Sigh. permalink fedilink source parent