If you don't know the pesticides then who is to say they are worse or better. Having studied this myself I would not tout organic farming as anything else than slightly better in some ways but not all.

They use copper sulfate which causes heavy metal buildup that leads to liver damage and kidney disease.

They used to use rotenone but it caused mitochondria damage leading to Parkinson's

They use pytherins that are highly toxic to insect but the FDA considers "not likely to cause human cancer".

They use Spinosad which is minimally toxic to mammals.

The thing is though they often have to use much more of these comparatively to regular farming. Essentially you can be trading slightly more environmental damage for slightly less human poisoning.

There is no doubt Monsanto's products have always caused cancer, they knew this from the start very reminiscent of big tobacco and oil. While they do criticize organic farming bringing them up as a shield of criticism for organic farming is disturbing to say the least.

Using the proper definition of a word is not fucking semantics. Organic is meant to mean natural in marketing terms which is based off its actual definition of containing carbon. I am not sure why you insist on caring water for organic farmers.

I will be frank, we need much better systems than the current organic farming scheme. It is not even arguably better because of the trade offs with environmental degredation.