you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 4 months ago (13 children)

"Blue no matter who" is a peace deal, which these guys are breaking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    So what's the solution in your opinion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (9 children)

    Disrupt their operations by ensuring that they lose elections, even if it's at the cost of handing the seat to a republican. If they are willing to cede a seat to a republican to stop a leftist, leftist must be willing to cede an election to republican in order to stop disrupt anti-socialism.

    Obviously, replacing the anti-socialist with a socialist would be the best outcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Ok, we've further ceded all elections to Republicans and now they're throwing all leftists and dissenters in prison/camps and have ruined the economy, the education system, started a bunch of wars we can't fund nor win, ruined the environment and privatized every public good. Now what?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Do you think the Democrats would not do the same if a revolutionary movement was built up? They don't even like this wave of social democrats taking office and are working to disrupt that. The tasks remain the same: educate, agitate, organize. Study theory, spread it and create a correct political line, and create a comprehensive political party that is dominated by the working classes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    No, I do not think Democrats would do all of the things I outlined above that I think would happen if Christofascist conservatives got complete power for consecutive terms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    If that's the case, then you need to dig back into how rooting out socialists and communists was and still is a bipartisan affair, how imperialism and genocide are bipartisan, and that nominally being more socially progressive does not mean the DNC pulls punches when demonizing labor organizing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    If they are willing to cede a seat to a republican to stop a leftist

    Are they, though? I get the feeling your definition of that is someone getting elected in the primary that you don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    They pushed the guy Mamdani primaries to run as an independent which, for them, only makes sense as an act of sabotage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments