▲ 515 ▼ Microsoft punishes idiots who purchased a "perpetual" license of Office 2019 for Mac by disabling it next month, pirates unaffected (www.theverge.com) submitted 4 months ago by Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 comments fedilink hide all child comments A license verification certificate expires and when it expires, Microsoft Office for Mac assumes it's unlicensed even if it has been fully paid for. So, any idiot who paid for Office 2019 for Mac "perpetual" will lose access to it next month. The same will happen with Office 2021 and Office 2024 in the future. Pirates are unaffected, only who paid for the product gets punished Good job 👍🏻
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (5 children) You win, you are the best, have a good day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children) Jesus christ just apologize and move on how hard is it to say "yeah sorry that was a bit rude" Instead of this passive aggressive stinkpiece Have some dignity, please permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children) Lmfao go fuck yourself. That was a half hearted attempt to leave this alone. You came at me with personal attacks white-knighting for people I described as ignorant without using the word ignorant, tripled down and now you want an apology? Please tell me what ignorant means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children) Fuck you too my man. The 'ignorant' thing is entirely a pivot. You've only mentioned it now after several comment doubling down on them being idiots and that's its their own fault. Being willfully ignorant and an idiot are entirely different things and had you said wilfully ignorant there would have been no discussion at all. And I'm not accepting you trying to act like I'm the unreasonable one for pointing out that what you wrote is a fucking asshole thing to say. And if you didn't mean it like, then that should've been clarified long ago, with a 'yeah that was a rude framing what i actually meant was this:' Instead of acting like you have been saying reasonable stuff all along, when no, you've only pivoted to a reasonable proposition now, in the face of criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child) It's not a pivot, it's expanding. If they didn't learn anything from them before this, they will be as described. Explain to me what being ignorant is Edit: and a reminder, we're arguing about words you put in my mouth. If you wanted an actual discussion you would have started one. This is my last reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) "AS DESCRIBED" IN THAT CONTEXT WOULD MEAN IDIOT, AS THAT WAS HOW THE ONE YOU REPLIED TO DESCRIBES THEM Edit: i did start an 'actual discussion' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children) Jesus christ just apologize and move on how hard is it to say "yeah sorry that was a bit rude" Instead of this passive aggressive stinkpiece Have some dignity, please permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children) Lmfao go fuck yourself. That was a half hearted attempt to leave this alone. You came at me with personal attacks white-knighting for people I described as ignorant without using the word ignorant, tripled down and now you want an apology? Please tell me what ignorant means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children) Fuck you too my man. The 'ignorant' thing is entirely a pivot. You've only mentioned it now after several comment doubling down on them being idiots and that's its their own fault. Being willfully ignorant and an idiot are entirely different things and had you said wilfully ignorant there would have been no discussion at all. And I'm not accepting you trying to act like I'm the unreasonable one for pointing out that what you wrote is a fucking asshole thing to say. And if you didn't mean it like, then that should've been clarified long ago, with a 'yeah that was a rude framing what i actually meant was this:' Instead of acting like you have been saying reasonable stuff all along, when no, you've only pivoted to a reasonable proposition now, in the face of criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child) It's not a pivot, it's expanding. If they didn't learn anything from them before this, they will be as described. Explain to me what being ignorant is Edit: and a reminder, we're arguing about words you put in my mouth. If you wanted an actual discussion you would have started one. This is my last reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) "AS DESCRIBED" IN THAT CONTEXT WOULD MEAN IDIOT, AS THAT WAS HOW THE ONE YOU REPLIED TO DESCRIBES THEM Edit: i did start an 'actual discussion' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children) Lmfao go fuck yourself. That was a half hearted attempt to leave this alone. You came at me with personal attacks white-knighting for people I described as ignorant without using the word ignorant, tripled down and now you want an apology? Please tell me what ignorant means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children) Fuck you too my man. The 'ignorant' thing is entirely a pivot. You've only mentioned it now after several comment doubling down on them being idiots and that's its their own fault. Being willfully ignorant and an idiot are entirely different things and had you said wilfully ignorant there would have been no discussion at all. And I'm not accepting you trying to act like I'm the unreasonable one for pointing out that what you wrote is a fucking asshole thing to say. And if you didn't mean it like, then that should've been clarified long ago, with a 'yeah that was a rude framing what i actually meant was this:' Instead of acting like you have been saying reasonable stuff all along, when no, you've only pivoted to a reasonable proposition now, in the face of criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child) It's not a pivot, it's expanding. If they didn't learn anything from them before this, they will be as described. Explain to me what being ignorant is Edit: and a reminder, we're arguing about words you put in my mouth. If you wanted an actual discussion you would have started one. This is my last reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) "AS DESCRIBED" IN THAT CONTEXT WOULD MEAN IDIOT, AS THAT WAS HOW THE ONE YOU REPLIED TO DESCRIBES THEM Edit: i did start an 'actual discussion' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children) Fuck you too my man. The 'ignorant' thing is entirely a pivot. You've only mentioned it now after several comment doubling down on them being idiots and that's its their own fault. Being willfully ignorant and an idiot are entirely different things and had you said wilfully ignorant there would have been no discussion at all. And I'm not accepting you trying to act like I'm the unreasonable one for pointing out that what you wrote is a fucking asshole thing to say. And if you didn't mean it like, then that should've been clarified long ago, with a 'yeah that was a rude framing what i actually meant was this:' Instead of acting like you have been saying reasonable stuff all along, when no, you've only pivoted to a reasonable proposition now, in the face of criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child) It's not a pivot, it's expanding. If they didn't learn anything from them before this, they will be as described. Explain to me what being ignorant is Edit: and a reminder, we're arguing about words you put in my mouth. If you wanted an actual discussion you would have started one. This is my last reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) "AS DESCRIBED" IN THAT CONTEXT WOULD MEAN IDIOT, AS THAT WAS HOW THE ONE YOU REPLIED TO DESCRIBES THEM Edit: i did start an 'actual discussion' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child) It's not a pivot, it's expanding. If they didn't learn anything from them before this, they will be as described. Explain to me what being ignorant is Edit: and a reminder, we're arguing about words you put in my mouth. If you wanted an actual discussion you would have started one. This is my last reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) "AS DESCRIBED" IN THAT CONTEXT WOULD MEAN IDIOT, AS THAT WAS HOW THE ONE YOU REPLIED TO DESCRIBES THEM Edit: i did start an 'actual discussion' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) "AS DESCRIBED" IN THAT CONTEXT WOULD MEAN IDIOT, AS THAT WAS HOW THE ONE YOU REPLIED TO DESCRIBES THEM Edit: i did start an 'actual discussion' permalink fedilink source parent