[–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Finally I have something to install when I clean up phones used by boomers.

I have no idea why boomers love to install 10 different ad-ridden PDF readers, all at the same time. One of them used 5gb of internet in 30 days. Why would they replace the default one with a reader that shows a mandatory 30 seconds ad before loading the file

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    This is why I always refuse to accept those "just edit the usercss to workaround your problem" - yeah and then It's going to be a huge headache with the useless ui updates

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I can burn it to a DVD or Blu-ray and get everything back up and running

    If it was possible to copy it bit by bit and just burn it as is, pirates wouldn't have bothered to remove it.

    CSS was specifically designed to fight 1:1 copies, at the time it was conceived, ripping movies to DivX/MP4/h264 wasn't a thing

    The DRM on discs works because they have data in areas that only a glass master in a $5M disc replicator can create

    Not to mention that ONE quad layer BD-R for the 4k blu-rays costs $25 - at that point is better to buy two physical copies and hold them in different places for backup

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    42000 CNY per month income for who? I went personally in china and the "we're hiring" signs for waiters were 2500 CNY per month outside Beijing and 4500 CNY per month in BJ and sh

  • source
  •  

    A license verification certificate expires and when it expires, Microsoft Office for Mac assumes it's unlicensed even if it has been fully paid for.

    So, any idiot who paid for Office 2019 for Mac "perpetual" will lose access to it next month.

    The same will happen with Office 2021 and Office 2024 in the future.

    Pirates are unaffected, only who paid for the product gets punished

    Good job 👍🏻

     

    TL;DR: bitlocker does not like grub

    Full story:

    Months ago I installed fedora on my desktop, dual booting Windows 11.

    In all this time I never had the need to boot into windows. I remembered that it worked fine after install, good, and then I forgot about that.

    Today I needed a specific windows only software, so at grub I chose the microsoft bootloader and... BITLOCKER.

    Huh? Bitlocker? Me? What? Searched frantically for that decryption password in my keepass, did not find. What?? How???

    After a few minutes staring at that screen I thought, ok let's just wipe that shit and reclaim the space. I went back to linux, opened the partition manager, then remembered that i had something important in single copy over there. Noooooo

    Went back to the boot screen to try again, still failed password.

    Then I notice the error:

    e_fve_pcr_mismatch

    that mismatch lets me think that maybe I had something wrong in my booting.

    I try to put windows first in the bios and it works! WHAT THE...?!??

    So, if i put linux first, then launch windows from grub, bitlocker takes the windows partition under ransom, i can only access if windows is first. And of course in windows 11 x64 is no longer possible add linux partitions in their boot manager (previously it was possible)

    Incompetence or maliciousness?

     

    I downloaded a cracked install from tpb (haxnode). It was a loader exe that loaded the original exe and supposedly removed the drm in RAM. It required admin permissions, I didn't trust it, but i ran in a vm and nothing happened.

    Then i told myself "i have microsoft defender and windows firewall control, they will warn me" and I ran it in my main laptop, and still nothing happened. Like, literally nothing happened. The original program would not start. It would simply exit. Nothing. The other 6 almost identical torrents from the same uploader but with a different program version had a similar result. I gave up.

    Then i reboot, and firstly i notice a couple DOS prompts flashing on the screen, and windows firewall control asking me if "aspnet_compiler.exe" is allowed to access the internet or not.

    Suspicious, i go to check that "aspnet_compiler.exe" and it's located in the .net system folder, i scan it with microsoft defender and it doesn't report as a virus. I do not pay attention to the fact that it doesn't have a valid Microsoft signature, and i tell myself "probably just a windows update" and i whitelist it on the firewall.

    After a few hours I realize "wait a minute: it's impossible that an official windows exe isn't signed by microsoft!" I go back to scan it, not infected... or it looks like, defender says "ignored because in whitelist". What? The "loader" put c:* in the whitelist!

    The "crack loader" wasn't a virus per se. It dropped an obfuscated batch in startup, which had a base64 encoded attachment of the actual malware, that was copied in the .net framework directory with unassuming names...

    And this for a $60 perpetual license program that i should buy anyway because it's for work

    view more: next ›