you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    Since when are Republicans in favor of Medicare for All, wealth taxes and cutting off funding for Israel? You guys should really try Googling him for a minute. It would be far less embarrassing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    You "found" his admission? Post a link, then. I'd love to see that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    So arguing online that “SS” lightning-bolt tattoos were a “culture” marker within Marine Scout Sniper units, not an expression of White supremacist ideology.

    Means he support Nazi's?

    Sure maybe it shows that he was told earlier what it means but it by no means proves or is evidence that he knew what it was when he got the tattoo, just that it was a standard thing that many Marines got.

    I also had an online handle for years which has the number 88 in it way before I found out that it was a hidden dog whistle for Nazi's. I guess I was a Nazi when I was 8 years old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    In the very best reading he's an idiot who KNEW the association and lied to save his face.

    That's STILL disqualifying. He's to dumb to be elected.

    Unfortunately it's now a "lesser evil" issue and a Republican would be worse, BUT YOU HAD A CHANCE TO HAVE NO EVIL as a choice and now you picked the guy that's the easiest possible target for propaganda from the Republicans

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Lol! You know where I first encountered that symbol, growing up? On the bottom of nearly every skateboard deck I ever owned. Same thing with the Iron Cross. It wasn't until senior year in highschool that I learned both those symbols were also used by the Nazis.

    In most places in the US you aren't going to learn that, unless you're already into WW2 history. To the vast majority of people, the only symbol that they recognize as a genuine Nazi symbol, is the swastika.

    If he had that tattooed on his chest, I'd take these accusations seriously. But a skull-and-crossbones? No. That's more of an unfortunate mistake, born out of a shitty education system.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    He never did any such thing.

    Hey, out of curiosity, did Israel commit genocide in Gaza?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    You dumbass yes Israel and Russia are both doing genocide and so is Musk by killing USAID

    https://www.nrsc.org/press-releases/new-evidence-shows-platner-knew-he-had-a-nazi-tattoo-2025-10-25/

    you can be against all evil, not just join a tribe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Lol. Check your source, "dumbass". If you don't recognize the actual Republicans as a bad source to link to for an attack on a Democrat, I'm not sure you should be participating in political discussions.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 41 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    Okay, he's a democrat that acts like a republican.

    Da fuq does this mean? I haven't heard anything that tells me that he's a homophobic closeted gay man, a pedophile, or a corporate grifter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    This guy is literally linking to the National Republican Senate Committee. He's either steeped in right-wing spaces or too ignorant to recognize the most basic of partisan entities.

    And to be clear, his attack comes from other news outlets, but if you don't recognize the actual Republicans as a bad source, I'm not sure you should be participating in political discussions.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 50 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    Okay, he's a democrat that acts like a republican.

    Pele, are we talking about the same person? Platner is a populist progressive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 5 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    jfc is this your line of logic? that's about as sound as "hitler was a vegetarian so all vegetarians are nazis" lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah that's not anything at all like what I said.

    In a vacuum, sure, it would be a weird thing to be paranoid about.

    But we're not in a vacuum, are we? There are several massive red flags about this guy, including gleeful murder of brown people and a fucking Nazi tattoo on his chest.

    So forgive me if I'm a little skeptical when he says left-adjacent things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    Move the goalposts harder daddy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    "That's your logic?"

    "No, that's a conclusion. This is my logic."

    "You're moving the goalpost!!1!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Fetterman wore the costume of a populist. Platner walks the walk of of a populist.

    Fetterman won because he wasn't doctor Oz.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Platner walks the walk of of a populist.

    What does this even mean, he's never held public office.

    If you really want to go by the man's actions, there is plenty of info out there about the awful shit that he got up to in Iraq.

    Fetterman won because he wasn't doctor Oz.

    Not true. People were absolutely excited about Fettermam winning the nomination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    The excitement was muted quite a bit by his stroke. At the time of the primary and for most of the general it wasn't clear if he was even going to be able to serve. He didn't even do unprepared speaking until a month before the election. There was definitely some campaigning that Giselle puppeting him or a special election was better than 6 years of Oz.

    But you're right that pre-strike lots of people were excited about his likely win.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Fetterman took AIPAC money. Platner didn't. Also the alternative is literally Susan Collins

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (18 children)

    Care to elaborate in that or just gonna make baseless inflammatory accusations about someone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (17 children)

    I'll deal with "the lesser evil" but I will NOT stop asking for no evil

    That dude needs to be watched and if people don't know what he's like because you decided the tribe identity is more valuable than your morals then your not better than the Republicans, because people are rightfully told to be wary of the dude who first said he didn't know he had a Nazi tattoo and THEN admitted he was inspired by Nazi death troops. The guy accused of sexual assault too.

    If you haven't seen the news articles screaming about hypocrisy, how do you think you'll beat the Republican if you don't know how to respond to the accusations?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/us/politics/platner-maine-senate-girlfriends-relationships.html

    Don't fucking call a Nazi tattoo baseless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    The fact that you are swallowing whole the narrative that the mass media is feeding you. Is part of the problem. It's already been corroborated by the men he served with that they didn't know what the deaths head was or what it meant and neither did he. The sexual assault allegations have already been proven largely false and fizzled out. Even one of the women contacted for the article has come out how the paper misrepresented her.

    Maybe rather than just reading all these biased articles screaming about hypocrisy. Take the time to look into any of these accusations and see if they actually hold up. Don't trust the media to be honest. Then you might actually see real hypocrisy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    https://www.nrsc.org/press-releases/new-evidence-shows-platner-knew-he-had-a-nazi-tattoo-2025-10-25/

    Even if the dude has no trace of evil, he has 100% trace of stupid dumbass and his lying about the tattoo is disqualifying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    Knowing after the fact is not even remotely the same as knowing while intentionally getting it. He was 23 when he got it. Nearly half his life ago. And several servicemen that were with him when he got it have corroborated his story. Let's crucify every stupid teenager and young adult. I'm sure the Earth would be much better without humans on it. Seriously do you even read what you type?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    I agree with the tattoo, he might have been young and stupid. We just don't want another fetterman in the mix.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

    The best answer if you end up being one of the people that wonder what Maine sees in this man. The best thing to do is to stop letting yourself be told about him and go talk to him or listen to the man himself.

    If Graham has someone who isn't himself advising him. They are both an idiot and a genius. Which kind of makes me think it is him. Kyle Kulinsky of secular talk the other day played a clip from an interview with platner where he spoke about masculinity and toxic masculinity. It's at the end of the segment. I think that clip illustrates fairly well what people see in him.

    As to him being another fetterman. I'm not going to say Graham will be perfect. He won't. He's going to disappoint everyone at some point. But he has literally called fetterman out personally. Fetterman didn't just become an asshole overnight. It wasn't the work of a stroke or anything like that. The man was a well-known bully and asshole in his own community. Even if he was a relatively successful mayor. He literally chased down and tackled an innocent black jogger holding them at shotgun point. Assuming that they were a criminal. The fact that he was bullying Mehmet Oz at the time was what everyone literally liked about him. They just thought it would never be turned on them. I'm not sure honestly what would qualify as anti-fetterman. But Graham is somewhere on the opposite end of the spectrum from fetterman. He's willing to put himself out, be vulnerable, and explain himself. Apologizing when necessary. Something that fetterman has repeatedly refused to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I'll give him a chance, don't get me wrong. I'm just watching him for a bit. The tattoo, the sexting, all that stuff, is just some drama that is usually reserved for republicans. If he stands by his word and does c+ job, I'm cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Actually the main/only woman the New York Times used in their hit piece has called The New York Times out for being misleading and dishonest. It's an epic shit show on the New York Times part. Illustrating that if they ever were trustworthy it certainly isn't now. It's hard to even know where to start with this whole clusterfuck. But the main woman referenced in their hit job is a conservative activist who helped start the women for Kavanaugh group to get his nomination to the Supreme Court through. And cover for his misogyny etc.

    So let's just start with that not being the sort of person you want to build a case or a story around in the first place. And then on top of that she's accusing them of misrepresenting her. Now while I think she absolutely would do anything to make the New York Times look bad. The New York Times absolutely stepped in it themselves. And all the other women that the New York Times contacted but didn't really use for their story have also chimed in that the New York Times description and representation of him was inaccurate.

    Platner has called out Israel and AIPAC. They desperately want something, anything to attack him with. Which is why the New York Times ran with such a bad story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Well that's good to know. The propaganda worked on me then. I'll give him a better chance now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    It's something we all have to be extra careful about these days. If you're going to watch mainstream information sources. It's not a bad idea to Pepper in some coverage from more left-leaning podcasters and radio shows.

    There's always the classic majority report. Which has been a long-lasting mainstay over the years consistently proven right.

    Mike at The humanist report seems solid too.

    Kyle at secular talk speaks with a tone that might be jarring to boomers and many Xers like myself. But he is on point and spits fire to millenials and younger demographics.

    Hell even the hometown duo here while very young are making waves. Dubbed silly and billy by Cenk Uygur. Though they seem a bit more meta.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I do the news every work day and try to stay with the mainstream, but weed out the obvious shitshows. It does lead to tunnel vision on the smaller metro areas, which is what happened here. I didn't have a source for Maine, which is probably part of the problem. I have one for other major cities, but not sure if there is a Maine comparable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I don't have one for specific cities. It's certainly not a bad idea. But a heck of a lot of work. But of that bunch I can't tell you how many times they have brought up coverage from those places when relevant. Enough that I generally feel comfortable trusting them more than the major news outlets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Then why would he deny knowing it, when it's demonstrated he did know, and why did he keep it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    How difficult is it to understand as has been corroborated and demonstrated. That he didn't know at the time the connotations it carried. He was a drunk 23-year-old on deployment overseas during the Iraq War nearly 20 years ago. Drunk 23-year-olds often get edgy tattoos. Like skull and crossbones. Which is what he got. Unfortunately he literally picked out one from the wall that he would come to regret more than any of the other variety.

    If you're going to so definitely assert that the man is a nazi. Name one single action on his part in the last 15 years that demonstrates this. One single action. You can't. The next best thing you even got is his Reddit post history. Which using the things he said in the past without listening to the things he sang now is hypocritical. But when it's all you have it's all you have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    And then he just keeps it? While knowing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Absolutely. Lots of people have things they are ashamed of or not proud about. So? Tattoos aren't easy or cheap to get removed or covered up generally. Definitely not as cheap as just keeping your shirt on. If he was this Nazi that you are pretending him to be. This stupid stalling crossbones tattoo wouldn't be your only evidence. And yet you're still completely stuck on it

  • source
  • parent