top 60 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 4 months ago

Hell yeah. Platner said it best in his victory speech:

He's standing up for Mainers that can't afford a senator for themselves.

The messaging is ON. POINT.

  • source
  • [–] 117 points 5 months ago* (43 children)

    I voted for him. Fuck the establishment. He refused to play dirty politics and sling mud, even when it was slung his way numerous times. I wish there were more candidates of his integrity.

    Everyone has a past, but people can grow up and change. Graham is no different. It's who he is today that matters.

    If you truely don't believe people can change, then what's the point of finding Jesus, going to prison or rehab, seeking mental therapy, etc.?

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (39 children)

    We don’t generally forgive convicts and let them have a new life, that’s why recidivism is so bad. Society is also quietly prejudiced against people with mental health issues, which is why it’s so hard to get treated or get time off for it. “Finding Jesus” is loaded in so many different ways I can’t cover that here.

    That said, I’m totally for understanding people can change and am very much against ghost banning people with a history that they have grown out of. People do change, everyone has things they’ve fucked up in the past.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Case in point: Smedley Butler.

    He was a retired Marine Corps Major General, started out as a true believer but paid attention to all the shit he was involved in and eventually realized that he was just violently enforcing the wishes of the wealthy true rulers of the American state.

    So when some of them approached him to join the Business Plot, where they'd coup the US government in a similar fashion to Mussolini's Italian coup (basically march a bunch of soldiers and supporters in to the captial while the government is unprepared to defend against a mob and demand the government be handed over, though in Italy's case it helped that they had a system where a monarch held power over the rest of the government and ended up getting their way by promising to leave the king alone). Butler instead sat in meetings to gather information and then turned on them, at which point the government had some harsh words for the plotters (that included GW Bush's grandfather) before sending them on their way to think about what they did wrong (and how to do it more effectively the next time).

    This guy wasn't just a marine but a leader of marines and though he didn't question his orders (that we know of anyways) in the moment, he did reflect on everything he had seen and done and didn't like it. IMO former believers who turn are even more important as allies than those who were always on the right side because the ones who have been on both sides have more experience and knowledge about the specifics of how the other side operates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    Yeah I'm really hoping Platner is another Smedley, but I'm afraid he might not be. Giving power to someone like this is scary. Hell the only reason Smedley was able to stop the business plot is that the conspirators assumed he hadn't changed.

    In the primaries I was tentatively pro Platner. In the general I'm just pro Platner. And if he wins and his actions match his words then in 6 years I'll be extremely pro Platner.

    Hell, for all I hate Fetterman I'm still glad he didn't lose the general, Senator Mehmet Oz would've been worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -20 points 5 months ago (35 children)

    Maybe I'm crazy, but "guys I grew out of the murderous Nazi beliefs" just doesn't cut it for me. Especially for someone running for office.

    They might even be telling the truth. Don't care, you were a fucking Nazi so I will never trust you with the levers of power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's there any Nazi ideology you can quote? Or are we still talking about a covered up tattoo?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 5 points 4 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    I'm not astroturfing shit, I'm just fucking pissed at all the "I refuse to vote for someone who supports genocide" people bending over backwards to avoid criticizing a man who has a Nazi tattoo and has openly talked about murdering Iraqis.

    Apparently all you need to do is just say some socialist shit, and you're golden.

    Have some fucking standards.

    I hope all of this concern ends up being unwarranted, I really do. And I would hold my nose and vote for him in the general if I were in Maine.

    But this "how dare you be at all skeptical of a man with a dark, murderous, past and a Nazi tattoo on his chest" shit is just too much.

    Like that's really all it takes? Just pay some lip service to socialism, and you're willing to ignore the biggest red flag for a Democratic Senate candidate I can remember ever seeing?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    If this guy was actually a Nazi he'd be fast-tracked in the Republican party instead of trying to play on hard mode rehabbing his image as a working class Democrat. You don't even have to cover your tattoos up as a Republican, they just let you be secdef

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Let's assume for the sake of this comment that it is all bullshit and he's actually right wing or whatever... The Republican party would now be in a win/win situation in Maine. No matter what the outcome is, they've won. They don't even need to spend money on that race.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    I think you're more of a Nazi than Platner. He got a pirate tattoo he later regretted. You're branding people with lifelong Scarlet Letters for innocent acts, declaring people inhuman for the most mild of actions. I wouldn't call you a Nazi, but you're definitely displaying more Nazi tendencies than Platner is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Plus they have an encyclopedic knowledge of Nazi symbology and expect everyone should as well

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Seriously. I had never even heard of a totenkopf until it came out he had one. To me it just looks like a skull n bones variant. I might've gotten one myself in complete ignorance. If he'd gotten a swastika, that would be an entirely different matter.

    Just consider though; he could have been driving a Volkswagen, using an IBM computer, wearing Chanel cologne, while draped in Hugo Boss. Imagine that. Why do esoteric symbols matter, while the corporations that participated in the genocide still get a pass?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it's so bad faith it's comical. It's ridiculously transparent. You could create a police line up of various deaths head iconography, from pirate flags to black death symbolism to US military units, with a few Nazi ones thrown in. Then ask these mosquitos sliming about Platner if they can identify the Nazi ones. I imagine 90% of them would fail that test.

    Frankly, unless they're an anti-fascist activist or a historian, anyone with that level of encyclopedic knowledge of SS symbols is a little sus. If someone told me they had that level of knowledge of Nazi symbolism, I would ask them if they also have that level of knowledge of other famous military or authoritarian movements. Do they also have such knowledge of Soviet, Chinese, Roman, or ancient Egyptian military symbolism? Do they study military iconography of all sorts? Or just the SS stuff? Honestly, I think anyone with that level of SS knowledge is telling on themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    The totenkopf is not an obscure thing, it's literally like the third or fourth most recognizable nazi symbol after the nazi swastika and the SS runes. Even if you manage to have that massive blind spot, the totenkopf does not look like a jolly roger or any other pirate imagery so that excuse falls flat. Dude knew the whole time it was a nazi tattoo. All that is to say nearly anyone is better than Collins and till he shows he hasn't I'm willing to believe he's changed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    I like voting for impulsive people with no foresight to research something they are permanently doing to themselves!

    This the game you want to play?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Lmao, people are known to be impulsive in their 20s when drunk. Not to mention the fact he got the tattoo at a time when we weren't walking around with smart phones in our pockets.

    So yeah it's not hard to believe that a 40 yr old has better decision making skills than their 20 yr old self

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (20 children)

    What Nazi beliefs has he espoused so far on the campaign trail?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Politicians never lie, good point. And it's not like we have at least two examples of this exact thing happening before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Alright well I guess we will see. Also fuck Susan Collins. I’m glad she’s outta there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    Enjoying killing innocent Iraqis. Next question?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (14 children)

    “Four tours as an infantryman in the Marines and then Army, did both Iraq and Afghanistan. It's hard to explain how much I enjoyed combat. It is both physically and intellectually challenging, and incredibly exciting (especially the first few times). I was never a huge fan of killing, at least not for killings sake, but I did love winning and that required killing.”

    From his 2015 reddit comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Sounds like he very much enjoyed it, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (12 children)

    I think that requires a wilful misinterpretation of what he said to conclude he "very much" enjoyed killing given he expressly says he did not. It's certainly questionable, but it's not as blatantly clear as many people are claiming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    Right, he hated doing it so much that he just had to go back 4 times. And then he continued to hate it while he joined Blackwater as a mercenary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (10 children)

    I can't find a single record of him saying he hated it. Many examples of him being disgusted with his past behavior and complacency with imperialism, but in none of them does he say he hated it at the time. Do you have a source where he claims that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    I was being sarcastic, lol. He clearly enjoyed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (8 children)

    And yet, I wasn't being sarcastic. Do you have anything to back up your claim? Because he has consistently represented himself on this issue, and it fundamentally disagrees with your assertions. I can't find any reason to doubt him or his characterization of himself - which I want to add, is still not exactly great. It's just not cut and dry like you're claiming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    I can't help you with your naivety. If someone continues to put themself in a situation where they're killing innocent civilians, says they can't even explain how much they enjoy "combat", and then tells you they don't like it, and you believe them, that's a you problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (6 children)

    No, I didn't think you could back your claims up. Thank you for confirming that for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Being forgiven doesn’t mean being chosen to lead the people.

    People late to their mcjobs are forgiven less than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    Being forgiven doesn’t mean being chosen to lead the people.

    Right. Votes are what counts, and votes are how one is chosen.

    People late to their mcjobs are forgiven less than this.

    He's not late to a job. He's running for an office, and he's running with a platform that he owns and a background he owns, and he's running against someone else with their own platform and baggage. This "mcjob" has 2 applicants that have passed the HR screening process and stand a chance at securing the open position. Which applicant is best suited to perform acceptably is up to the voter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Sure people can change, but has he actually shown anyone that he has changed? Time will tell wether he's just another Fetterman or if he has genuinly changed, but I'm not holding my breath.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I'm glad to see Susan Collins on the way out. Perhaps there's a lesson establishment Democrats can learn from this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 56 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    We need more Graham Platners running and winning.

    I can't believe how many "liberals" are falling for the smear campaign by the right against him.

    I'd rather have a candidate that admits his mistakes and has now adopted the correct positions, than these establishment freaks virtue signaling while supporting an orange pedophile war criminal.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It is not just the right doing the smearing. Just look at some of the comments on this thread. Tankies out in full force calling him a fascist while in the same breath defending anything Russia does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    It's almost like some of those avowed leftist accounts might have common ground with the right and center in trying to keep the left from being successful. They want a progressive left that is an electoral failure, either because they're accelerationists who think if things get bad enough then their fantasy government will emerge or they're just straight up saboteurs. The worst thing that can happen is for popular progressives to gain power.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 4 months ago

    I wonder how many establishment Democrats will rally around Susan Collins like they rallied around Joe Lieberman in 2008?

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    To Defenders of Platner: It's OK to not want yet another douchebag repping the team. It gets fucking old. Let people advocate for not wanting a shitheel for a senator.

    To Platner's Liberal Attackers: Get on the bus. Primary is over, you have your anti-Trump candidate. Voting for a politician isn't declaring undying faith, it's taking a bus ride to get closer to where you want to go. A politician will seldom get you exactly where you want to go, but they can get you closer by the way they vote, even if they suck as people. So come voting time, get on the bus.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    Susan is still very concerned.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    How is oppo research not a dead issue in this time of trump hot-mics? Anybody not guilty of human trafficking who has a decent suggestion should be on the ballot.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    I've been wondering the same. Do they really think sexts and having a toxic relationship are going to rustle our jimmies after the horrors that spilled out of the Epstein files and the subsequent blatant coverup from the powers that be?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›