you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 118 points 5 months ago* (18 children)

Really long and thin strips that can't be angled. They can only be serviced while the track is closed and need to survive whatever debris a train might fling at them. Is this really the best way to place them?

Solar freaking railways.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    For the life of me I don’t understand why people are putting them anywhere before every rooftop is covered with them. Roofs are dead space and unlikely to have debris issues (at least compared to a railway).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago*

    It's companies trying to make a quick buck. They tried this with roads too.

    Obviously every home should have them first and all newly built homes should be built with solar efficiency in mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Or in parking lots. It would also have the added benefit of providing cover for cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    You need some serious concrete and/or steel hardware to build a carpark roof that can hold the solar panels without easily being damaged by cars or broken by strong wind, so that massively inflates the costs. If you had a state owned company producing cheap solutions for this it could work though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Every parking lot needs approval of the location, its probably a a pain in the ass, and would disrupt parking while being built which impacts sales (or will be perceived to anyway). If this worked, you only need to deal with a small group of people for a very large space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    You can lay them down and remove them again and also clean them with automation. There are power lines nearby as well as consumers, electric trains.

    Installing on roofs is manual labor and needs electricians. Which is why you see so many solar farms by the roadside.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It seems like the sort of naive gimmick one might expect from a MAD Magazine cartoonist, or Elon Musk on a ketamine binge. It would work to an extent for a while, though whether the amount of electricity generated would justify the maintenance costs to keep it going is another matter.

    The arguments against it are the power yield of a panel pointing upwards, and presumably covered with dirt shed by passing trains. That said, it would suffer less impact damage than photovoltaic roads/bike paths floated elsewhere (the occasional rock impact, as opposed to constant traffic). Also, there is a lot of track, so even if a segment generates little power, it adds up. Not enough to power electric trains, though possibly enough to offset the power bill after operating costs are taken into account.

    I’m guessing this installation is an experiment to quantify these figures rather than a commitment to roll this out more broadly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago

    I’m guessing this installation is an experiment to quantify these figures rather than a commitment to roll this out more broadly.

    No need to guess, it's right there in the article.

  • source
  • parent