WM: niri

distro: arch BTW

terminal: foot

notification: fnott made by the same developer of foot

web browser: qutebrowser

statusbar: i3bar-river and powered by i3status-rs

I made my own bash script to randomize wallpapers that took me long time to make. If you want to try it out: randwall

My dotfiles are not very organized yet that's why I haven't git them for now but I will do soon ....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

Looks great!

How do you like fnott? I assume you switched to it from mako — what made you switch? What are the pros and cons?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    Mako better than fnott in:

    • better in handling images (thumbnails) than fnott because fnott lags if there's many notifications with high resolution thumbnails that are displayed at once.
    • It has more anchor positions. you cannot have center-right or top-center anchors in Fnott. Fnott has only 5 anchor positions while Mako has 9.
    • You can restore previous expired notifications with makoctl restore command while fnottctl doesn't has it.

    Fnott is better than mako in:

    • You have dynamic width so every notification has it is own width instead of all of them have the same width which is the main reason why I use Fnott.
    • Easier to config.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    The dynamic width thing is huge… so many notifications spend their precious initial width on boilerplate bs, I’ll give it a shot…

    tho tbh all I really need is a full screen, undismissable thing for when my battery is dying.. other notifications are very lovely but the number of times I’ve only realized I was low on battery when my computer starts shutting down is… a lot.

  • source
  • parent