58
Proof of AI-assisted political profiling by Unruffled @ lemmy.dbzer0.com Discussion & Question (join.piefed.social)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/fediverse@piefed.social
locked 71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

from the mod log:

Mojng5xTnVM7YHd.png

https://s.faf-pb.xyz/lXxek was the old url but they took it down - I have a copy at https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/evidence-llm-used-for-banning.txt

The output from the LLM was provided as proof that someone needed to be banned.

I didn't want to do this but my hand was forced by their dissembling, minimization and bullshit. Note how the output includes a nice big logo with a slogan and ascii graphics - this was not a one-off experiment, this is an app they were proud to call their own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Oh, now I understand. Well I would say that's OK then. Just be aware I won't do night watch ;)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    Same, i will probably lock it during my sleep time than unlock when i'm awake. I did the same with a luanti server.

    For now the thread is going well. Thank to them all. :)

    And don't do mod task if you only wanted to do the wiki or something else. ;)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    And don’t do mod task if you only wanted to do the wiki or something else. ;)

    Oh don't worry about that ;)

    It just happened I considered the OP post oddly interesting to comment on it (even though I still think this is not the best place to discuss that kind of questions, it also opened a few very interesting perspectives worth exploring) and I also wanted to make it clear to the person that 'reported it that it had been dully noted by a mod (ie me wearing my mod hat, in my first reply) and that said mod saw no real issue in the OP post.

    After that, the few feedbacks I received had promises in them. I tried to reply as openly and as usefully as I could. Alas, it seems we're quickly moving towards a more ad hominem type of discussion around the classical "you're doing it wrong or you must be dishonest if you don't agree with us/me" type of exchange that I won't contribute much more to if that doesn't change. Will see.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Well don't hesitate to lock with a message that explain why you lock the post if we move toward this kind of exchange.

    It can excalate quickly and we have lot things to do. :)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Will do if I have to, but like I told the person I'm more than willing to give them an opportunity to keep this a real discussion, not an ideological pillow fight ;)

    If you read it, so far it is still perfectly correct with barely a few hints at... anger, or not even that: a mere desire to trigger some emotional reaction on my part maybe.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent