from the mod log:

Mojng5xTnVM7YHd.png

https://s.faf-pb.xyz/lXxek was the old url but they took it down - I have a copy at https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/evidence-llm-used-for-banning.txt

The output from the LLM was provided as proof that someone needed to be banned.

I didn't want to do this but my hand was forced by their dissembling, minimization and bullshit. Note how the output includes a nice big logo with a slogan and ascii graphics - this was not a one-off experiment, this is an app they were proud to call their own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 19 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

https://faf-pb.xyz/?ab3c4aae88b64dbc#J8jz6mNac8kRHm5aMXBJQjbUr9pbwMfWrdEaNm1jywhx

Is the evidence in question that Unruffled acted on when deciding to ban the user for breaking their instance rule against Zionism.

Your previous post made it sound like this was an automatic AI going around banning users for wrongthink, when the reality is its a search tool for mods and admins to quickly look through a users potentially years long comment history.

It is chock full of examples of such behaviour, along with hyperlinks to the offending comments. What exactly is the issue here, that an AI tool searched through a log and pointed out examples of rule breaking behaviour and got a person who downplays genocide banned?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 4 points 6 months ago

    It is chock full of examples of such behaviour, along with hyperlinks to the offending comments.

    The ban log makes it unclear whether the comments are all offending, or even supposed to be. Was the user banned for this?

    Date: 2026-04-17T13:51:01.747786Z
    Comment ID: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/24890311
    Post ID: 591643
    Community ID: 351
    
    When the Molly hits just right.
    
  • source
  • parent