FauxLiving comments on Which instances have the most ban-happy moderators? Analysis inside

Which instances have the most ban-happy moderators? Analysis inside (piefed.social)

submitted 6 months ago by rimu@piefed.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

locked 372 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I did some analysis of the modlog and found this:

Ok, bigger instances ban more often. Not surprising, because they have more communities and more users and more trouble. But hang on, dbzer0 isn't a very big instance. What happens if we do a ratio of bans vs number of users?

Ok, so lemmy.ml, dbzer0 and pawb are issue an outsized amount of bans for the number of users they have... But surely the number of communities the instance hosts is going to mean they have to ban more? Bans are used to moderate communities, not just to shield their user-base from the outside. Let's look at the number of bans per community hosted:

Seems like dbzer0 really loves to ban. Even more than the marxists and the furries! What is it about dbzer0 that makes them such prolific banners?

Raw-ish numbers and calculations are in this spreadsheet if anyone wants to make their own charts.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You were targeted by draconic_neo and mystic mushroom.

They have created a bunch of different communities across the fediverse so they can spam people's modlogs with bullshit harassment.

See my mod history, it's exactly the same pattern.

A huge amount of bans all within a few seconds of each other, all from communities modded by draconic_neo or mystic mushroom, if you examine the individual communities you find that they have no activity.

They only exist to spam people's mod log with nonsense because they can't press the downvote button hard enough.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social -3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

If a normal person were to call me a troll many times in a row, I would strongly consider blocking them. But I wonder if blocking these people would have any effect upon this spam?

I also find it the height of irony that we are all told by dbzer0 admins that we should strive hard to understand, since those mods must surely have their reasons for doing what they did, whereas if e.g. Lemmy.World were to block calls for outright murder of themselves personally, then all of a sudden moderation should no longer be allowed to moderate that violent rhetoric spammed at them. One rule for thee while another, different rule for me...

Also, I am somewhat anti-AI, but not to the extent of trolling anyone. Though do facts matter anymore - i.e. have these two mods been kicked off of dbzer0 for their false accusations, sent preemptively out to half the Threadiverse?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I also find it the height of irony that we are all told by dbzer0 admins that we should strive hard to understand, since those mods must surely have their reasons for doing what they did

That would be a fair argument except for the fact that the 'communities' that they 'moderate' have zero actual activity. Some have posts by draconic, some have exactly zero posts (and the community is locked). They're just squatting communities with popular Reddit counterparts.

Though do facts matter anymore - i.e. have these two mods been kicked off of dbzer0 for their false accusations, sent preemptively out to half the Threadiverse?